From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751916AbdHCTvK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:51:10 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57336 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751236AbdHCTvJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:51:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 12:51:05 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: hare@suse.de, jthumshirn@suse.de, hch@lst.de, Mark Salyzyn , Robb Glasser , Doug Gilbert , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sg: Prevent potential double frees in sg driver Message-ID: <20170803195105.GB26674@kroah.com> References: <20170803190248.51537-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20170803192354.GA1598@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 12:34:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > Why no one on the to: line? > > I usually cc everyone from get_maintainer.pl. Should I be using > --to= then explicitly for named folks, and --cc= for lists? That's usually a good idea, many email clients throw away stuff if there is nothing on the "To:" line. > > And do you want this in the stable kernel trees? > > Looks like I can follow up on option #2 once this patch has > been reviewed+merged by maintainers. I'll note to use > option #1 next time, unless you suggest I send a v2? I can > do so if this patch has a v2+. If you have to resend it, then add it, otherwise please remember when it hits Linus's tree to send the git commit id to stable@vger and the developers there can handle it. thanks, greg k-h