From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix selftest/bpf/test_pkt_md_access on s390x
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 08:40:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804064027.69086-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Commit 18f3d6be6be1 ("selftests/bpf: Add test cases to test narrower ctx field loads")
introduced new eBPF test cases. One of them (test_pkt_md_access.c)
fails on s390x. The BPF verifier error message is:
[root@s8360046 bpf]# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 349 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 212 nsec
[....]
libbpf: load bpf program failed: Permission denied
libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG ---
libbpf:
0: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0)
invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=1
libbpf: -- END LOG --
libbpf: failed to load program 'test1'
libbpf: failed to load object './test_pkt_md_access.o'
Summary: 29 PASSED, 1 FAILED
[root@s8360046 bpf]#
This is caused by a byte endianess issue. S390x is a big endian
architecture. Pointer access to the lowest byte or halfword of a
four byte value need to add an offset.
On little endian architectures this offset is not needed.
Fix this and use the same approach as the originator used for other files
(for example test_verifier.c) in his original commit.
With this fix the test program test_progs succeeds on s390x:
[root@s8360046 bpf]# ./test_progs
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv4 236 nsec
test_pkt_access:PASS:ipv6 217 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv4 3624 nsec
test_xdp:PASS:ipv6 1722 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv4 926 nsec
test_l4lb:PASS:ipv6 1322 nsec
test_tcp_estats:PASS: 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-fd-by-notexist-prog-id 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-fd-by-notexist-map-id 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-info(fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-info(fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-prog-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check total prog id found by get_next_id 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check get-map-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:get-map-fd(next_id) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check get-map-info(next_id->fd) 0 nsec
test_bpf_obj_id:PASS:check total map id found by get_next_id 0 nsec
test_pkt_md_access:PASS: 277 nsec
Summary: 30 PASSED, 0 FAILED
[root@s8360046 bpf]#
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c
index 71729d4..8393ced 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_pkt_md_access.c
@@ -12,12 +12,23 @@
int _version SEC("version") = 1;
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
#define TEST_FIELD(TYPE, FIELD, MASK) \
{ \
TYPE tmp = *(volatile TYPE *)&skb->FIELD; \
if (tmp != ((*(volatile __u32 *)&skb->FIELD) & MASK)) \
return TC_ACT_SHOT; \
}
+#else
+#define TEST_FIELD_OFFSET(a, b) ((sizeof(a) - sizeof(b)) / sizeof(b))
+#define TEST_FIELD(TYPE, FIELD, MASK) \
+ { \
+ TYPE tmp = *((volatile TYPE *)&skb->FIELD + \
+ TEST_FIELD_OFFSET(skb->FIELD, TYPE)); \
+ if (tmp != ((*(volatile __u32 *)&skb->FIELD) & MASK)) \
+ return TC_ACT_SHOT; \
+ }
+#endif
SEC("test1")
int process(struct __sk_buff *skb)
--
2.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-04 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-04 6:40 Thomas Richter [this message]
2017-08-04 19:06 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-04 20:34 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170804064027.69086-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome