From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752062AbdHHHHp (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 03:07:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:34281 "EHLO mail-wr0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751918AbdHHHHn (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 03:07:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 08:07:38 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Ludovic Desroches , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com, romain.izard.pro@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: use sama5d2 compatible string for SMC Message-ID: <20170808070738.cd5esjyz6m35rj2b@dell> References: <20170718132220.25018-1-ludovic.desroches@microchip.com> <20170718132220.25018-4-ludovic.desroches@microchip.com> <20170807154100.hvl5ua3vdqttghfj@dell> <20170807212813.hj5pfmlh4wl2mh47@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170807212813.hj5pfmlh4wl2mh47@piout.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 07 Aug 2017, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On 07/08/2017 at 16:41:00 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > > > A new compatible string has been introduced for sama5d2 SMC to allow to > > > manage the registers mapping change. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > > > --- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > I've already applied that one and sent it to arm-soc as a fix for 4.13 > (I think we agreed on that). Okay, I just looked through my mail and remember the conversation. So the question remains; why was the patch re-sent as part of this set *after* it had already been applied? Patch unapplied, thanks. > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi > > > index cc06da394366..3e6e2dbc2595 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi > > > @@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ > > > }; > > > > > > hsmc: hsmc@f8014000 { > > > - compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-smc", "syscon", "simple-mfd"; > > > + compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-smc", "syscon", "simple-mfd"; > > > reg = <0xf8014000 0x1000>; > > > interrupts = <5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 6>; > > > clocks = <&hsmc_clk>; > > > -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog