From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: Add boottime and real timestamps
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:24:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809182433.GE27873@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c34f31c7-82a8-e380-91c2-783216b7e2b7@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:17:33PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2017 01:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> >
> > Note printk_late_init() is a late_initcall(). This means if the
> > printk_time_setting was disabled it will take a while to enable it. Enabling it
> > is done at the device_initcall(), so if printk setting is disabled but a user
> > enables it with a toggle of the module param there is a period of time during
> > which time resolution would be different.
>
> I'm not sure I follow your comment. Could you elaborate with an example of
> what you think is going wrong or might be confusing?
Sure let's consider this:
+static u64 printk_get_ts(void)
+{
+ u64 mono, offset_real;
+
+ if (printk_time <= PRINTK_TIME_LOCAL)
+ return local_clock();
+
+ if (printk_time == PRINTK_TIME_BOOT)
+ return ktime_get_boot_log_ts();
+
+ mono = ktime_get_real_log_ts(&offset_real);
+
+ if (printk_time == PRINTK_TIME_MONO)
+ return mono;
+
+ return mono + offset_real;
+}
So even if printk_time was flipped in the end the backend routines used will be
local_clock(), ,ktime_get_boot_log_ts() or ktime_get_real_log_ts().
This is used here;
@@ -1643,7 +1756,7 @@ static bool cont_add(int facility, int level, enum log_flags flags, const char *
cont.facility = facility;
cont.level = level;
cont.owner = current;
- cont.ts_nsec = local_clock();
+ cont.ts_nsec = printk_get_ts();
cont.flags = flags;
}
But lets inspect these new calls:
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -477,6 +479,24 @@ u64 notrace ktime_get_boot_fast_ns(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_get_boot_fast_ns);
+u64 ktime_get_real_log_ts(u64 *offset_real)
+{
+ *offset_real = ktime_to_ns(tk_core.timekeeper.offs_real);
+
+ if (timekeeping_active)
+ return ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
+ else
+ return local_clock();
+}
+
+u64 ktime_get_boot_log_ts(void)
+{
+ if (timekeeping_active)
+ return ktime_get_boot_fast_ns();
+ else
+ return local_clock();
+}
+
So they are really only effectively calling something other than
what lock_clock() returns *iff* timekeeping_active is true. But
this is only set later at the respective device_initcall() in this
file:
@@ -1530,6 +1550,8 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
+
+ timekeeping_active = 1;
}
So when the boot param is processed and prints out that it has
changed someone inspecting any time setting after that print
may assume its using after that ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() or
time_get_boot_fast_ns() but this is not accurate, it will use
local_clock() until *after* device_initcall().
So in between boot and this particular device_initcall() time
resolution can only be local_time(). Seems worth documenting
that.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-04 1:18 Prarit Bhargava
2017-08-04 15:36 ` Mark Salyzyn
2017-08-07 12:41 ` Prarit Bhargava
2017-08-07 13:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-08-04 16:42 ` Mark Salyzyn
2017-08-07 17:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-07 18:17 ` Prarit Bhargava
2017-08-09 18:24 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-08-09 22:42 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170809182433.GE27873@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=salyzyn@android.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome