mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <ast@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] bpf: Initialise mod[] in bpf_trace_printk
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:25:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170814122544.GQ6973@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <598DDF88.6020809@iogearbox.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3209 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:47:04PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> On 08/09/2017 10:34 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 08/09/2017 09:39 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> > [...]
> >> time (but please consider looking at the other patch which is certainly
> >> a more real issue).
> >
> > Sorry for the delay, started looking into that and whether we
> > have some other options, I'll get back to you on this.
> 
> Could we solve this more generically (as in: originally intended) in
> the sense that we don't need to trust the gcc va_list handling; I feel
> this is relying on an implementation detail? Perhaps something like
> below poc patch?

Well it works on MIPS32 and MIPS64 with tracex5.

Tested-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>

Cheers
James

> 
> Thanks again,
> Daniel
> 
>  From 71f16544d455abb6bb82f7253c17c14d2a395e91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <71f16544d455abb6bb82f7253c17c14d2a395e91.1502469361.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:56:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix bpf_trace_printk on 32 bit
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> ---
>   kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 3738519..d4cb36f 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -204,10 +204,33 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_get_probe_write_proto(void)
>   		fmt_cnt++;
>   	}
> 
> -	return __trace_printk(1/* fake ip will not be printed */, fmt,
> -			      mod[0] == 2 ? arg1 : mod[0] == 1 ? (long) arg1 : (u32) arg1,
> -			      mod[1] == 2 ? arg2 : mod[1] == 1 ? (long) arg2 : (u32) arg2,
> -			      mod[2] == 2 ? arg3 : mod[2] == 1 ? (long) arg3 : (u32) arg3);
> +#define __BPF_TP_EMIT()	__BPF_ARG3_TP()
> +#define __BPF_TP(...)							\
> +	__trace_printk(1 /* fake ip will not be printed */,		\
> +		       fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +
> +#define __BPF_ARG1_TP(...)						\
> +	((mod[0] == 2 || (mod[0] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64))	\
> +	  ? __BPF_TP(arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__)				\
> +	  : ((mod[0] == 1 || (mod[0] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32))	\
> +	      ? __BPF_TP((long)arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__)			\
> +	      : __BPF_TP((u32)arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__)))
> +
> +#define __BPF_ARG2_TP(...)						\
> +	((mod[1] == 2 || (mod[1] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64))	\
> +	  ? __BPF_ARG1_TP(arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__)				\
> +	  : ((mod[1] == 1 || (mod[1] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32))	\
> +	      ? __BPF_ARG1_TP((long)arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__)		\
> +	      : __BPF_ARG1_TP((u32)arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__)))
> +
> +#define __BPF_ARG3_TP(...)						\
> +	((mod[2] == 2 || (mod[2] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64))	\
> +	  ? __BPF_ARG2_TP(arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__)				\
> +	  : ((mod[2] == 1 || (mod[2] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32))	\
> +	      ? __BPF_ARG2_TP((long)arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__)		\
> +	      : __BPF_ARG2_TP((u32)arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__)))
> +
> +	return __BPF_TP_EMIT();
>   }
> 
>   static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_trace_printk_proto = {
> -- 
> 1.9.3

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-14 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07 22:25 [RFC PATCH 0/2] bpf_trace_printk() fixes James Hogan
2017-08-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] bpf: Fix bpf_trace_printk on 32-bit architectures James Hogan
2017-08-07 22:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] bpf: Initialise mod[] in bpf_trace_printk James Hogan
2017-08-08  8:46   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-08 16:48     ` David Miller
2017-08-08 21:20       ` James Hogan
2017-08-08 21:54         ` David Miller
2017-08-09  7:39           ` James Hogan
2017-08-09 20:34             ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-11 16:47               ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-08-14 12:25                 ` James Hogan [this message]
2017-08-14 12:44                 ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170814122544.GQ6973@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org \
    --to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®