From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752569AbdHOMlY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:41:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55079 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313AbdHOMlW (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:41:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:41:19 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Chen Yu Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PM / Hibernate: Feed NMI wathdog when creating snapshot Message-ID: <20170815124119.GG29067@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1502731156-24903-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1502731156-24903-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 15-08-17 01:19:16, Chen Yu wrote: [...] > @@ -2561,8 +2562,10 @@ void mark_free_pages(struct zone *zone) > unsigned long i; > > pfn = page_to_pfn(page); > - for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); i++) > + for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); i++) { > swsusp_set_page_free(pfn_to_page(pfn + i)); > + touch_nmi_watchdog(); > + } this is rather excessive. Why don't you simply call touch_nmi_watchdog once per every 1000 pages? Or once per free_list entry? Moreover why don't you need to touch_nmi_watchdog in the loop over all pfns in the zone (right above this loop)? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs