From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752642AbdHOPXb (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:23:31 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:50383 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751810AbdHOPXa (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:23:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:22:59 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Colin King , Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Yehezkel Bernat , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: fix incorrect value assigned to req->response_type Message-ID: <20170815152259.idjvtw5tdg24xj2o@mwanda> References: <20170815143133.26500-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <20170815143834.GL2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170815143834.GL2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:38:34PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:31:33PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > req->response_type is being assigned the sizeof TB_CFG_PKG_RESET > > and should actually be assigned TB_CFG_PKG_RESET. Fix this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > > IIRC I already acked this some time ago ;-) > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg > > BTW, you should CC Greg as he has been gathering Thunderbolt related > patches. I added him now. Yeah. I sent this patch on Jun 14. "[PATCH] thunderbolt: Fix reset response_type" I didn't CC Greg, either. Someone should probably update MAINTAINERS if Greg needs to get these emails. Colin, could you please add Fixes tags to your patches? It helps me investigate how bugs are introduced. I know we all had a long thread and agreed to not add them if the patch probably doesn't fix a user visible bug, but this one is clearly a bugfix. regards, dan carpenter