From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752789AbdHOPY5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:24:57 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:60870 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752513AbdHOPY4 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:24:56 -0400
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:24:49 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
Subject: Re: early x86 unseeded randomness
Message-ID: <20170815152449.vdugv4svi34offfe@pd.tnic>
References: <CA+55aFzhFABbj2XdTt8sL7h=pZqQn7Tf1_fJyVQcE5kpuLAfNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170814180048.m3igiaiunlyb5wur@pd.tnic>
 <CA+55aFzzNrsTiL67cS_ZsqZNLf3w0dqmrNbw5yXpT6BPm3zMYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170814190013.zixopgjyq26ukxcj@pd.tnic>
 <20170815013124.2afytkibspxrikdn@thunk.org>
 <20170815064437.GA1986@1wt.eu>
 <20170815074254.6byayhspc5tdtjb5@gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708151001290.1886@nanos>
 <20170815134514.r6qjotjgfmurwh64@pd.tnic>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708151546380.1886@nanos>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708151546380.1886@nanos>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:48:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Go ahead. What you actually want to do is to replace boot_cpu_has() with a
> real cpuid() check because boot_cpu_has() is not initialized on real early
> boot.

Right.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.