From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 4/9] completion: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:49:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170817124909.5hhinhjguokxecp4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817123038.GK7017@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > this change - or can I pick this up into the scheduler tree?
>
> Timely question! ;-)
>
> My current plan is to send you a pull request like the following later
> today, Pacific Time (but rebased adding Steve Rostedt's Reviewed-by).
> This patch is on one of the branches, currently v4.13-rc2..93d8d7a12090
> ("arch: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions") in my
> -rcu tree.
>
> Ah, and v4.13-rc2..7391304c4959 ("membarrier: Expedited private command")
> is mostly outside of RCU as well.
>
> Since I will be rebasing and remerging anyway, if you would prefer that I
> split the spin_unlock_wait() and/or misc branches out, I am happy to do so.
> If I don't hear otherwise, though, I will send all seven branches using
> my usual approach.
>
> So, if you want something different than my usual approach, please just
> let me know!
No, all branches together sounds good to me!
If you are rebasing anyway, here are some (very minor) commit title nits I noticed:
> swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average
> rcu: use idle versions of swait to make idle-hack clear
Capitalization.
> membarrier: Expedited private command
Should start with a verb.
> doc: RCU documentation update
doc: Update RCU documentation
?
> doc: No longer allowed to use rcu_dereference on non-pointers
doc: Describe that it is no longer allowed to use rcu_dereference() on non-pointers
?
> torture: Add --kconfig argument to kvm.sh
> rcutorture: Don't wait for kernel when all builds fail
Is there a difference between 'torture: ' and 'rcutorture: ' prefixes?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 22:12 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Remove spin_unlock_wait() Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core: Fix net_conntrack_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/9] task_work: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/9] sched: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/9] completion: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-15 16:16 ` [PATCH v5 " Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-16 15:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-08-17 15:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-17 8:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-17 12:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-17 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-08-17 14:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-17 15:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/9] exit: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] ipc: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] drivers/ata: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] locking: Remove spin_unlock_wait() generic definitions Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-24 22:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 9/9] arch: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 0/10] Remove spin_unlock_wait() Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 01/10] atomics: Revert addition of comment header to spin_unlock_wait() Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 02/10] net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core: Fix net_conntrack_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 03/10] task_work: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 04/10] sched: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 05/10] completion: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 06/10] exit: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 07/10] ipc: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 08/10] drivers/ata: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 09/10] locking: Remove spin_unlock_wait() generic definitions Paul E. McKenney
2017-07-31 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 10/10] arch: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170817124909.5hhinhjguokxecp4@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome