mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2]  Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:25:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818012555.GY20323@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502077834-11137-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:50:32PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> When cpudl_find() returns any among free_cpus, the cpu might not be
> closer than others, considering sched domain. For example:
> 
>    this_cpu: 15
>    free_cpus: 0, 1,..., 14 (== later_mask)
>    best_cpu: 0
> 
>    topology:
> 
>    0 --+
>        +--+
>    1 --+  |
>           +-- ... --+
>    2 --+  |         |
>        +--+         |
>    3 --+            |
> 
>    ...             ...
> 
>    12 --+           |
>         +--+        |
>    13 --+  |        |
>            +-- ... -+
>    14 --+  |
>         +--+
>    15 --+
> 
> In this case, it would be best to select 14 since it's a free cpu and
> closest to 15(this_cpu). However, currently the code select 0(best_cpu)
> even though that's just any among free_cpus. Fix it.

Could you let me know your opinions about this?

> Change from v5
>    -. exclude two patches already picked up by peterz
>       (sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology)
>       (sched/deadline: Change return value of cpudl_find())
>    -. apply what peterz fixed for 'prefer sibling', into deadline and rt
> 
> Change from v4
>    -. remove a patch that might cause huge lock contention
>       (by spin lock(&cpudl.lock) in a hot path of scheduler)
> 
> Change from v3
>    -. rename closest_cpu to best_cpu so that it align with rt
>    -. protect referring cpudl.elements with cpudl.lock
>    -. change return value of cpudl_find() to bool
> 
> Change from v2
>    -. add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING
> 
> Change from v1
>    -. clean up the patch
> 
> Byungchul Park (2):
>   sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq()
>   sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq()
> 
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  kernel/sched/rt.c       | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-18  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07  3:50 Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  3:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Byungchul Park
2017-08-15 15:19   ` Steven Rostedt
2017-08-16  0:38     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  1:42       ` Steven Rostedt
2017-08-16  2:17         ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16 13:32           ` Steven Rostedt
2017-08-16 14:04             ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16 14:25               ` Steven Rostedt
2017-08-07  3:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq() Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:12   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-18  1:25 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-08-18  4:51   ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology Joel Fernandes (Google)
2017-08-18  5:34     ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170818012555.GY20323@X58A-UD3R \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®