mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Andy Gospodarek <gospo@broadcom.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] PCI: iproc: retry request when CRS returned from EP
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:47:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170828214753.GL8154@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503551066-23212-3-git-send-email-oza.oza@broadcom.com>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:34:25AM +0530, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> PCIe spec r3.1, sec 2.3.2
> If CRS software visibility is not enabled, the RC must reissue the
> config request as a new request.
> 
> - If CRS software visibility is enabled,
> - for a config read of Vendor ID, the RC must return 0x0001 data
> - for all other config reads/writes, the RC must reissue the
>   request
> 
> iproc PCIe Controller spec:
> 4.7.3.3. Retry Status On Configuration Cycle
> Endpoints are allowed to generate retry status on configuration
> cycles. In this case, the RC needs to re-issue the request. The IP
> does not handle this because the number of configuration cycles needed
> will probably be less than the total number of non-posted operations
> needed.
> 
> When a retry status is received on the User RX interface for a
> configuration request that was sent on the User TX interface,
> it will be indicated with a completion with the CMPL_STATUS field set
> to 2=CRS, and the user will have to find the address and data values
> and send a new transaction on the User TX interface.
> When the internal configuration space returns a retry status during a
> configuration cycle (user_cscfg = 1) on the Command/Status interface,
> the pcie_cscrs will assert with the pcie_csack signal to indicate the
> CRS status.
> When the CRS Software Visibility Enable register in the Root Control
> register is enabled, the IP will return the data value to 0x0001 for
> the Vendor ID value and 0xffff  (all 1’s) for the rest of the data in
> the request for reads of offset 0 that return with CRS status.  This
> is true for both the User RX Interface and for the Command/Status
> interface.  When CRS Software Visibility is enabled, the CMPL_STATUS
> field of the completion on the User RX Interface will not be 2=CRS and
> the pcie_cscrs signal will not assert on the Command/Status interface.
> 
> Per PCIe r3.1, sec 2.3.2, config requests that receive completions
> with Configuration Request Retry Status (CRS) should be reissued by
> the hardware except reads of the Vendor ID when CRS Software
> Visibility is enabled.
> 
> This hardware never reissues configuration requests when it receives
> CRS completions.
> Note that, neither PCIe host bridge nor PCIe core re-issues the
> request for any configuration offset.
> 
> For config reads, this hardware returns CFG_RETRY_STATUS data when
> it receives a CRS completion for a config read, regardless of the
> address of the read or the CRS Software Visibility Enable bit.
> 
> This patch implements iproc_pcie_config_read which gets called for
> Stingray, if it receives a CRS completion, it retries reading it again.
> In case of timeout, it returns 0xffffffff.
> For other iproc based SOC, it falls back to PCI generic APIs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> index 61d9be6..37f4adf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
>  #define APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT             0
>  #define APB_ERR_EN                   BIT(APB_ERR_EN_SHIFT)
>  
> +#define CFG_RETRY_STATUS             0xffff0001
> +#define CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US  500000 /* 500 milli-seconds. */
> +
>  /* derive the enum index of the outbound/inbound mapping registers */
>  #define MAP_REG(base_reg, index)      ((base_reg) + (index) * 2)
>  
> @@ -473,6 +476,64 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_ep_cfg_reg(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
>  	return (pcie->base + offset);
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned int iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(void __iomem *cfg_data_p)
> +{
> +	int timeout = CFG_RETRY_STATUS_TIMEOUT_US;
> +	unsigned int data;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * As per PCIe spec r3.1, sec 2.3.2, CRS Software
> +	 * Visibility only affects config read of the Vendor ID.
> +	 * For config write or any other config read the Root must
> +	 * automatically re-issue configuration request again as a
> +	 * new request.
> +	 *
> +	 * For config reads, this hardware returns CFG_RETRY_STATUS data when
> +	 * it receives a CRS completion for a config read, regardless of the
> +	 * address of the read or the CRS Software Visibility Enable bit. As a
> +	 * partial workaround for this, we retry in software any read that
> +	 * returns CFG_RETRY_STATUS.
> +	 */
> +	data = readl(cfg_data_p);
> +	while (data == CFG_RETRY_STATUS && timeout--) {
> +		udelay(1);
> +		data = readl(cfg_data_p);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (data == CFG_RETRY_STATUS)
> +		data = 0xffffffff;
> +
> +	return data;
> +}
> +
> +static int iproc_pcie_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> +				    int where, int size, u32 *val)
> +{
> +	struct iproc_pcie *pcie = iproc_data(bus);
> +	unsigned int slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
> +	unsigned int fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
> +	unsigned int busno = bus->number;
> +	void __iomem *cfg_data_p;
> +	unsigned int data;
> +
> +	/* root complex access. */
> +	if (busno == 0)
> +		return pci_generic_config_read32(bus, devfn, where, size, val);

It sounds like Stingray advertises CRS SV support in its Root Capabilities
register.  I think we should mask out PCI_EXP_RTCAP_CRSVIS so we don't
advertise it.  That will keep Linux from trying to enable it.  I know the
hardware doesn't look at PCI_EXP_RTCTL_CRSSVE, but there's no point in
confusing users reading the lspci output.

We did something similar with f09f8735fb9c ("PCI: xgene: Disable
Configuration Request Retry Status for v1 silicon").

I tried to do this in the patch I pushed to pci/host-iproc.

> +
> +	cfg_data_p = iproc_pcie_map_ep_cfg_reg(pcie, busno, slot, fn, where);
> +
> +	if (!cfg_data_p)
> +		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> +
> +	data = iproc_pcie_cfg_retry(cfg_data_p);
> +
> +	*val = data;
> +	if (size <= 2)
> +		*val = (data >> (8 * (where & 3))) & ((1 << (size * 8)) - 1);
> +
> +	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer
>   * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c
> @@ -567,8 +628,13 @@ static int iproc_pcie_config_read32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
>  				    int where, int size, u32 *val)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> +	struct iproc_pcie *pcie = iproc_data(bus);
>  
>  	iproc_pcie_apb_err_disable(bus, true);
> +	if (pcie->type == IPROC_PCIE_PAXB_V2)
> +		ret = iproc_pcie_config_read(bus, devfn, where, size, val);
> +	else
> +		ret = pci_generic_config_read32(bus, devfn, where, size, val);
>  	ret = pci_generic_config_read32(bus, devfn, where, size, val);

This last pci_generic_config_read32() call looks like a duplicate.

>  	iproc_pcie_apb_err_disable(bus, false);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-28 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-24  5:04 [PATCH v8 0/3] PCI: iproc: SOC specific fixes Oza Pawandeep
2017-08-24  5:04 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] PCI: iproc: factor out ep configuration access Oza Pawandeep
2017-08-24  5:04 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] PCI: iproc: retry request when CRS returned from EP Oza Pawandeep
2017-08-28 19:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-28 19:39     ` Oza Oza
2017-08-28 19:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-28 20:45         ` Oza Oza
2017-08-28 21:47   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2017-08-29  5:32     ` Oza Oza
2017-08-29 20:02       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-30  9:18         ` Oza Oza
2017-08-24  5:04 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] PCI: iproc: add device shutdown for PCI RC Oza Pawandeep
2017-08-28 21:53 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] PCI: iproc: SOC specific fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-29  5:25   ` Oza Oza

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170828214753.GL8154@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gospo@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jonmason@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oza.oza@broadcom.com \
    --cc=oza.pawandeep@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®