mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"lizefan@huawei.com" <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
	"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com" 
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	"eparis@redhat.com" <eparis@redhat.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"dvhart@infradead.org" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] futex: convert futex_pi_state.refcount to refcount_t
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 21:12:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170901191234.ghybbmpm73miwmkp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B6FF6369D@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:03:55PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:24:16PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:05:33AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > > > > Actually on the second thought: does the above memory ordering differences
> > > > > really apply when  we have ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT? To me it looks like the way
> > > > > how it is currently implemented for x86 is the same way as it is for atomic
> > cases.
> > > >
> > > > Never look to x86 for memory ordering, its boring.
> > > >
> > > > And yes, for the ARM implementation it can certainly make a difference.
> > >
> > > So, yes, what I am trying to say is that it can really depend if you have
> > ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT
> > > enabled or not and then also based on architecture. Thus I believe is also true for
> > atomic: there
> > > might be differences when you use arch. dependent version of function or not.
> > 
> > So the generic one in lib/refcount.c is already weaker on ARM, they
> > don't need to do a ARCH specific 'fast' implementation for the
> > difference to show up.
> 
> But can they make "fast" implementation on ARM that would give stronger memory guarantees?

Whatever for?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-01 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-30 12:22 [PATCH 00/15] v5 kernel core pieces refcount conversions Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched: convert sighand_struct.count to refcount_t Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched: convert signal_struct.sigcnt " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched: convert user_struct.__count " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 04/15] sched: convert numa_group.refcount " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 05/15] sched/task_struct: convert task_struct.usage " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 06/15] sched/task_struct: convert task_struct.stack_refcount " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 07/15] perf: convert perf_event_context.refcount " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 08/15] perf/ring_buffer: convert ring_buffer.refcount " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 09/15] perf/ring_buffer: convert ring_buffer.aux_refcount " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 10/15] uprobes: convert uprobe.ref " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 11/15] nsproxy: convert nsproxy.count " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 12/15] groups: convert group_info.usage " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 13/15] creds: convert cred.usage " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 14/15] futex: convert futex_pi_state.refcount " Elena Reshetova
2017-09-01  7:39   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-01  9:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01  9:43       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-01 10:52         ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-09-01 11:05         ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-09-01 12:34           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 13:24             ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-09-01 13:36               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 17:03                 ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-09-01 19:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-09-04 10:31                     ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-09-04 12:00                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-14 16:02                         ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-10-20 12:03                           ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-10-20 12:30                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-23  7:36                               ` Reshetova, Elena
2017-08-30 12:22 ` [PATCH 15/15] kcov: convert kcov.refcount " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-31 23:48 ` [PATCH 00/15] v5 kernel core pieces refcount conversions Kees Cook
2017-09-01  9:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 16:55     ` Kees Cook
2017-09-01 17:08       ` Reshetova, Elena
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-25  9:41 [PATCH 00/15] v4 " Elena Reshetova
2017-08-25  9:41 ` [PATCH 14/15] futex: convert futex_pi_state.refcount to refcount_t Elena Reshetova
2017-07-18 10:29 [PATCH 00/15] v4 kernel core pieces refcount conversions Elena Reshetova
2017-07-18 10:30 ` [PATCH 14/15] futex: convert futex_pi_state.refcount to refcount_t Elena Reshetova

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170901191234.ghybbmpm73miwmkp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®