From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753255AbdIDGIA (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:08:00 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:35479 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753189AbdIDGH6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:07:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:07:56 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Mark Brown Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andy Shevchenko , Juergen Gross Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the spi tree Message-ID: <20170904160756.32f3a55c@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20170828140503.63b569bb@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20170828140503.63b569bb@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:05:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > tools/Makefile > > between commit: > > e9d4650dcc59 ("spi: tools: add install section") > > from the spi tree and commit: > > ecda85e70277 ("x86/lguest: Remove lguest support") > > from the tip tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc tools/Makefile > index 616e7722b327,a19b176b914b..000000000000 > --- a/tools/Makefile > +++ b/tools/Makefile > @@@ -90,8 -89,8 +89,8 @@@ freefall: FORC > kvm_stat: FORCE > $(call descend,kvm/$@) > > - all: acpi cgroup cpupower gpio hv firewire lguest liblockdep \ > + all: acpi cgroup cpupower gpio hv firewire liblockdep \ > - perf selftests turbostat usb \ > + perf selftests spi turbostat usb \ > virtio vm net x86_energy_perf_policy \ > tmon freefall objtool kvm_stat > > @@@ -101,7 -100,7 +100,7 @@@ acpi_install > cpupower_install: > $(call descend,power/$(@:_install=),install) > > - cgroup_install firewire_install gpio_install hv_install lguest_install perf_install spi_install usb_install virtio_install vm_install net_install objtool_install: > -cgroup_install firewire_install gpio_install hv_install perf_install usb_install virtio_install vm_install net_install objtool_install: > ++cgroup_install firewire_install gpio_install hv_install perf_install spi_install usb_install virtio_install vm_install net_install objtool_install: > $(call descend,$(@:_install=),install) > > liblockdep_install: Just a reminder that this conflict still exists. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell