mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	x86@kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, akataria@vmware.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	longman@redhat.com, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
Date: Tue,  5 Sep 2017 15:24:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170905132444.7163-4-jgross@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170905132444.7163-1-jgross@suse.com>

There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
environment.

Make virt_spin_lock() a paravirt operation in order to enable users
to select an explicit behavior like bare metal.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h       |  5 ++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c  | 14 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c             |  2 ++
 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
index c25dd22f7c70..d9e954fb37df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -725,6 +725,11 @@ static __always_inline bool pv_vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 	return PVOP_CALLEE1(bool, pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted, cpu);
 }
 
+static __always_inline bool pv_virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	return PVOP_CALLEE1(bool, pv_lock_ops.virt_spin_lock, lock);
+}
+
 #endif /* SMP && PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
index 19efefc0e27e..928f5e7953a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
@@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ struct pv_lock_ops {
 	void (*kick)(int cpu);
 
 	struct paravirt_callee_save vcpu_is_preempted;
+	struct paravirt_callee_save virt_spin_lock;
 } __no_randomize_layout;
 
 /* This contains all the paravirt structures: we get a convenient
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index 48a706f641f2..fbd98896385c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -17,6 +17,25 @@ static inline void native_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 	smp_store_release((u8 *)lock, 0);
 }
 
+static inline bool native_virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
+	 * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
+	 * horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues.
+	 */
+
+	do {
+		while (atomic_read(&lock->val) != 0)
+			cpu_relax();
+	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
 extern void native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
 extern void __pv_init_lock_hash(void);
@@ -38,33 +57,32 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 {
 	return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
 }
+
+void native_pv_lock_init(void) __init;
 #else
 static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 {
 	native_queued_spin_unlock(lock);
 }
+
+static inline void native_pv_lock_init(void)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
 #define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
 static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 {
-	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
-		return false;
-
-	/*
-	 * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
-	 * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
-	 * horrible lock 'holder' preemption issues.
-	 */
-
-	do {
-		while (atomic_read(&lock->val) != 0)
-			cpu_relax();
-	} while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0);
-
-	return true;
+	return pv_virt_spin_lock(lock);
+}
+#else
+static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	return native_virt_spin_lock(lock);
 }
+#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */
 #endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
 
 #include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
index 26e4bd92f309..1be187ef8a38 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
@@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ bool pv_is_native_spin_unlock(void)
 		__raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock;
 }
 
+__visible bool __native_virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	return native_virt_spin_lock(lock);
+}
+PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__native_virt_spin_lock);
+
 struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	.queued_spin_lock_slowpath = native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath,
@@ -27,6 +33,14 @@ struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
 	.wait = paravirt_nop,
 	.kick = paravirt_nop,
 	.vcpu_is_preempted = __PV_IS_CALLEE_SAVE(_paravirt_false),
+	.virt_spin_lock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__native_virt_spin_lock),
 #endif /* SMP */
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pv_lock_ops);
+
+void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
+{
+	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+		pv_lock_ops.virt_spin_lock =
+			__PV_IS_CALLEE_SAVE(_paravirt_false);
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 54b9e89d4d6b..21500d3ba359 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
 #include <asm/i8259.h>
 #include <asm/realmode.h>
 #include <asm/misc.h>
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
 
 /* Number of siblings per CPU package */
 int smp_num_siblings = 1;
@@ -1381,6 +1382,7 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
 	/* already set me in cpu_online_mask in boot_cpu_init() */
 	cpumask_set_cpu(me, cpu_callout_mask);
 	cpu_set_state_online(me);
+	native_pv_lock_init();
 }
 
 void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
-- 
2.12.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-05 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-05 13:24 [PATCH 0/4] make virt_spin_lock() a " Juergen Gross
2017-09-05 13:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] paravirt: add generic _paravirt_false() function Juergen Gross
2017-09-05 13:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] paravirt: switch vcpu_is_preempted to use _paravirt_false() on bare metal Juergen Gross
2017-09-05 13:24 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2017-09-05 13:55   ` [PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 14:01     ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-05 14:02   ` Waiman Long
2017-09-05 14:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 14:19       ` Waiman Long
2017-09-05 14:10   ` Waiman Long
2017-09-05 14:18     ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-05 14:24       ` Waiman Long
2017-09-05 14:31         ` Waiman Long
2017-09-05 14:42           ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-06  7:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 12:44             ` Waiman Long
2017-09-06 13:06               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 13:11                 ` Waiman Long
2017-09-05 13:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] paravirt,xen: correct xen_nopvspin case Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170905132444.7163-4-jgross@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®