From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] workqueue: Add a decrement-after-return and wake if 0 facility
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 06:29:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170905132951.GB1774378@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150428045304.25051.1778333106306853298.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Hello, David.
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:40:53PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Add a facility to the workqueue subsystem whereby an atomic_t can be
> registered by a work function such that the work function dispatcher will
> decrement the atomic after the work function has returned and then call
> wake_up_atomic() on it if it reached 0.
>
> This is analogous to complete_and_exit() for kernel threads and is used to
> avoid a race between notifying that a work item is about to finish and the
> .text segment from a module being discarded.
>
> The way this is used is that the work function calls:
>
> dec_after_work(atomic_t *counter);
>
> to register the counter and then process_one_work() calls it, potentially
> wakes it and clears the registration.
>
> The reason I've used an atomic_t rather than a completion is that (1) it
> takes up less space and (2) it can monitor multiple objects.
Given how work items are used, I think this is too inviting to abuses
where people build complex event chains through these counters and
those chains would be completely opaque. If the goal is protecting
.text of a work item, can't we just do that? Can you please describe
your use case in more detail? Why can't it be done via the usual
"flush from exit"?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-05 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-01 15:40 David Howells
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] refcount: Implement inc/decrement-and-return functions David Howells
2017-09-01 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 21:15 ` David Howells
2017-09-01 21:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 22:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 22:51 ` David Howells
2017-09-04 7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-04 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-04 16:08 ` David Howells
2017-09-05 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] Pass mode to wait_on_atomic_t() action funcs and provide default actions David Howells
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] Add a function to start/reduce a timer David Howells
2017-10-20 12:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-09 0:33 ` David Howells
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] afs: Lay the groundwork for supporting network namespaces David Howells
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] afs: Add some protocol defs David Howells
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] afs: Update the cache index structure David Howells
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] afs: Keep and pass sockaddr_rxrpc addresses rather than in_addr David Howells
2017-09-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] afs: Allow IPv6 address specification of VL servers David Howells
2017-09-01 15:42 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] afs: Overhaul cell database management David Howells
2017-09-01 15:42 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] afs: Retry rxrpc calls with address rotation on network error David Howells
2017-09-01 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] AFS: Namespacing part 1 David Howells
2017-09-05 13:29 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-09-05 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] workqueue: Add a decrement-after-return and wake if 0 facility David Howells
2017-09-06 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170905132951.GB1774378@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome