From: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] genirq/msi: Fix populating multiple interrupts
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:35:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170906103540.373864a2.john@metanate.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <858dec65-6980-184f-8851-59c45d13f9e3@arm.com>
On allocating the interrupts routed via to a wire-to-MSI bridge, we
iterate over the MSI descriptors to build the hierarchy, but fail to use
the descriptor interrupt number, and instead use the base number,
generating the wrong IRQ domain mappings.
The fix is to use the MSI descriptor interrupt number when setting up
the interrupt instead of the base interrupt for the allocation range.
The only saving grace is that although the MSI descriptors are allocated
in bulk, the wired interrupts are only allocated one by one (so
desc->irq == virq) and the bug goes unnoticed.
Fixes: 2145ac9310b60 ("genirq/msi: Add msi_domain_populate_irqs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.5+
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:52:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 05/09/17 18:12, John Keeping wrote:
> > Use the correct variable to set up each interrupt in turn rather than
> > configuring the first interrupt "nvec" times.
>
> Thanks for addressing this. I think this bug deserves a slightly better
> write-up. How about something like:
Much better, thanks. I've copied and pasted your suggestion for v2.
Changes in v2:
- Use Marc's text for the commit message
- Add Fixes, Cc, Reviewed-by tags
kernel/irq/msi.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
index 48eadf416c24..3fa4bd59f569 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
@@ -315,11 +315,12 @@ int msi_domain_populate_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
ops->set_desc(arg, desc);
/* Assumes the domain mutex is held! */
- ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy(domain, virq, 1, arg);
+ ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy(domain, desc->irq, 1,
+ arg);
if (ret)
break;
- irq_set_msi_desc_off(virq, 0, desc);
+ irq_set_msi_desc_off(desc->irq, 0, desc);
}
if (ret) {
--
2.14.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-06 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-05 17:12 [PATCH] genirq/msi: fix " John Keeping
2017-09-06 8:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-09-06 9:35 ` John Keeping [this message]
2017-09-06 9:46 ` [tip:irq/urgent] genirq/msi: Fix " tip-bot for John Keeping
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170906103540.373864a2.john@metanate.com \
--to=john@metanate.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome