From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Make the SME mask a u64
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:38:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170907093837.76zojtkgebwtqc74@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04defa6c-9cda-817c-c764-2911a5d45319@amd.com>
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:26:40PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> 32-bit seems to be working well - thanks
Thanks Boris and Brijesh for testing!
---
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
The SME encryption mask is for masking 64-bit pagetable entries. It
being an unsigned long works fine on X86_64 but on 32-bit builds in
truncates bits leading to Xen guests crashing very early.
And regardless, the whole SME mask handling shouldnt've leaked into
32-bit because SME is X86_64-only feature. So, first make the mask u64.
And then, add trivial 32-bit versions of the __sme_* macros so that
nothing happens there.
Reported-and-tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Fixes: 21729f81ce8a ("x86/mm: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption")
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 2 +-
include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 13 +++++++++----
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 8e618fcf1f7c..6a77c63540f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
-extern unsigned long sme_me_mask;
+extern u64 sme_me_mask;
void sme_encrypt_execute(unsigned long encrypted_kernel_vaddr,
unsigned long decrypted_kernel_vaddr,
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ void swiotlb_set_mem_attributes(void *vaddr, unsigned long size);
#else /* !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
-#define sme_me_mask 0UL
+#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
static inline void __init sme_early_encrypt(resource_size_t paddr,
unsigned long size) { }
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
index 0fbd09269757..3fcc8e01683b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static char sme_cmdline_off[] __initdata = "off";
* reside in the .data section so as not to be zeroed out when the .bss
* section is later cleared.
*/
-unsigned long sme_me_mask __section(.data) = 0;
+u64 sme_me_mask __section(.data) = 0;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sme_me_mask);
/* Buffer used for early in-place encryption by BSP, no locking needed */
diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
index 1255f09f5e42..265a9cd21cb4 100644
--- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
-#define sme_me_mask 0UL
+#define sme_me_mask 0ULL
#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */
@@ -30,18 +30,23 @@ static inline bool sme_active(void)
return !!sme_me_mask;
}
-static inline unsigned long sme_get_me_mask(void)
+static inline u64 sme_get_me_mask(void)
{
return sme_me_mask;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
/*
* The __sme_set() and __sme_clr() macros are useful for adding or removing
* the encryption mask from a value (e.g. when dealing with pagetable
* entries).
*/
-#define __sme_set(x) ((unsigned long)(x) | sme_me_mask)
-#define __sme_clr(x) ((unsigned long)(x) & ~sme_me_mask)
+#define __sme_set(x) ((x) | sme_me_mask)
+#define __sme_clr(x) ((x) & ~sme_me_mask)
+#else
+#define __sme_set(x) (x)
+#define __sme_clr(x) (x)
+#endif
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
--
2.13.0
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-07 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-06 3:45 SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky
2017-09-06 9:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-06 9:45 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <CY4PR12MB11415936E980489690575E65EC970@CY4PR12MB1141.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2017-09-06 16:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-06 18:06 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-06 18:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-06 21:03 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-09-07 0:26 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-07 9:38 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-09-07 10:34 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Make the SME mask a u64 tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2017-09-06 13:54 ` SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky
2017-09-06 13:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-06 14:03 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170907093837.76zojtkgebwtqc74@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®