mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>,
	Mylene Josserand <mylene.josserand@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: mutex_lock issues during poweroff
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:40:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170907124033.bmtsam7nizs7gnvv@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170907121619.uj245cykaxmhsuve@flea.lan>

On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:16:19PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> One thing worth noting is that we couldn't reproduce the issue with a
> 4.13. We can't bisect really easily due to the amount of patches that
> we still have on 4.9 and have all been merged since, but it seems like
> the bug was fixed (either on purpose or as a side effect), and was
> never sent to stable. Looking at the history of kernel/locking/mutex.c
> during that window didn't really show anything obvious though.
> 
> If you have any ideas or spot something very wrong, I'd be happy to
> hear about. Thanks!

Well, we did a _complete_ rewrite of the mutex primitive in v4.10-rc1.

Part of the reason for that rewrite was fixing a starvation case, but
for that you'd need to actually have contending usage, which you claim
not to have.

Aside from that I really can't remember any specific issues with the old
code (4.9 is such a long time ago). You could try to disable the
optimistic spinning code, see if that helps.

You did also say you were running on an ARM64, there were a few memory
ordering fixes like for example commit:

  50972fe78f24 ("locking/osq_lock: Fix osq_lock queue corruption")

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-07 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-07 12:16 Maxime Ripard
2017-09-07 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-09-08 14:43   ` Maxime Ripard
2017-09-08 16:11     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170907124033.bmtsam7nizs7gnvv@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mylene.josserand@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®