From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Current mainline git (24e700e291d52bd2) hangs when building e.g. perf
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 21:37:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170909193750.l5o5xtquogmscmom@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXp=WVhMasO=xvNy556CoBgDqJx6xEfN3jdTJOJB4LFUg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 12:28:30PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I propose the following fix. If PCID is on, then, in
> enter_lazy_tlb(), we switch to init_mm with the no-flush flag set.
> (And we give init_mm its own dedicated ASID to keep it simple and fast
> -- no need to use the LRU ASID mapping to assign one dynamically.) We
> clear the bit in mm_cpumask. That is, we more or less just skip the
> whole lazy TLB optimization and rely on PCID CPUs having reasonably
> fast CR3 writes. No extra IPIs. I suppose I need to benchmark this.
> It will certainly slow down workloads that rapidly toggle between a
> user thread and a kernel thread because it forces serialization on
> each mm switch, but maybe that's not so bad.
Sounds ok so far.
> If PCID is off, then we leave the old CR3 value when we go lazy, and
> we also leave the flag in mm_cpumask set. When a flush is requested,
> we send out the IPI and switch to init_mm (and flush because we have
> no choice). IOW, the no-PCID behavior goes back to what it used to
> be.
Ok, question: why can't we load the new CR3 value too, immediately? Or
are we saying, we might get to return to the same CR3 we had before we
were lazy so we won't need to do an unnecessary CR3 write with the same
value. A microoptimization, if you will.
Yes?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-09 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-05 7:27 Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-05 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05 9:55 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-06 12:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-06 13:15 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-07 6:28 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-08 5:35 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-08 6:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-08 8:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-08 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-08 9:48 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-08 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-08 10:39 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-08 11:30 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-08 16:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-08 17:16 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-08 21:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-08 21:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-08 23:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-08 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-09 0:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-09 1:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-09 1:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-09 17:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-09 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-09 6:39 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 10:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 11:07 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 13:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 13:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 13:39 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 14:20 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 14:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 14:43 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 16:32 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 17:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 17:23 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 17:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 18:14 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 18:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 18:46 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 19:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 19:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-09 18:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-09 19:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-09 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-09 19:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-09 19:37 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-09-10 4:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-10 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-10 20:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-17 17:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-11 1:12 ` Rik van Riel
2017-09-11 1:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-11 15:08 ` Rik van Riel
2017-09-12 7:14 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-09 8:13 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-08 14:51 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170909193750.l5o5xtquogmscmom@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®