From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751258AbdILHAk (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:00:40 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:38083 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbdILHAi (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:00:38 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4ZKVjYtE95si0Yys3yvm/QYdvGaDOpAHQ2zNLrsBLBfGXuK6QXBMdhB+wdAEJLwMjGWZeNbw== Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:00:34 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Minchan Kim Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] zram: remove zlib from the list of recommended algorithms Message-ID: <20170912070034.GC703@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> References: <20170912050005.3247-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170912050005.3247-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170912064945.GB2068@bbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170912064945.GB2068@bbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (09/12/17 15:49), Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 02:00:05PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > ZSTD tends to outperform deflate/inflate, thus we remove > > zlib from the list of recommended algorithms and recommend > > zstd instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky > > Suggested-by: Minchan Kim > > > One of my colleague have tested zstd compared zlib with a some > workload 4K data and he said it was not much better compared to > zlib so please give me a time to test it by myself. > I will test it with my sample data which dumped from my desktop. ok, no prob. this patch is not mandatory, and I don't see any problems if we will keep zlib in the list. -ss