From: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix double count on issued discard commands
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:48:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170913084830epcms1p8a0a01f9de4c8f09730206203b9969a79@epcms1p8> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2894eac-1fba-daf9-480f-1d0cbef67423@huawei.com>
> Actually, we didn't change priority of discard command, so that it is still
> synchronous IO for I/O scheduler, hence I/O interference will still exist if we
> try to issue discard without IO aware ability.
> Of course we can change the priority of discard command to lower, but potential
> issue is that with ROW I/O scheduler in kernel or FTL, async I/O will handle
> very slowly in heavy load scenario, if we are going to trigger sync write IO in
> place in where we're doing async discard, we will face long latency.
> Still I think it is worth to build the ability to issue async discard as a part
> of discard policy and later we can adjust policy based on different scenario.
> Thanks,
Oh, I see.
f2fs is sending discard requests as "sync" requests, I didn't know that.
Right, I just though in case of CFQ I/O scheduler, but f2fs has to consider the other
schedulers, but CFQ.
Thanks, :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 3:38 Jaegeuk Kim
2017-09-12 1:53 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-09-12 3:53 ` Chao Yu
2017-09-12 4:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim
[not found] ` <CGME20170912042935epcas1p4630737028cc7b9536a0c688c92084e84@epcms1p7>
2017-09-12 4:34 ` Daeho Jeong
2017-09-12 17:11 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-09-13 7:13 ` Chao Yu
[not found] ` <CGME20170912042935epcas1p4630737028cc7b9536a0c688c92084e84@epcms1p8>
2017-09-13 8:48 ` Daeho Jeong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170913084830epcms1p8a0a01f9de4c8f09730206203b9969a79@epcms1p8 \
--to=daeho.jeong@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®