From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] kvm,async_pf: Use swq_has_sleepers()
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:08:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170913200824.28067-3-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170913200824.28067-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
... as we've got the new helper now. This caller already
does the right thing, hence no changes in semantics.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
virt/kvm/async_pf.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
index bb298a200cd3..57bcb27dcf30 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
@@ -106,11 +106,7 @@ static void async_pf_execute(struct work_struct *work)
trace_kvm_async_pf_completed(addr, gva);
- /*
- * This memory barrier pairs with prepare_to_wait's set_current_state()
- */
- smp_mb();
- if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq))
+ if (swq_has_sleeper(&vcpu->wq))
swake_up(&vcpu->wq);
mmput(mm);
--
2.12.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-13 20:08 [PATCH v2 0/7] swait: Introduce and use swq_has_sleeper() Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/wait: Add swq_has_sleepers() Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-13 20:08 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2017-09-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] kvm,lapic: Justify use of swait_activate() Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-15 11:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] kvm,x86: Fix apf_task_wake_one() wq serialization Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] kvm: Serialize wq active checks in kvm_vcpu_wake_up() Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] kvm,powerpc: Serialize wq active checks in ops->vcpu_kick Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-13 20:08 ` [PATCH 7/7] kvm,mips: Fix potential swait_active() races Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-13 20:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-13 22:22 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-09-15 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-15 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] swait: Introduce and use swq_has_sleeper() Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-19 8:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170913200824.28067-3-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome