From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: YiPing Xu <xuyiping@hisilicon.com>
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, roy.chenjun@hisilicon.com,
colin.king@canonical.com, wanghao24@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: interface: set the next alarm event appropriately
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:57:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170921085752.q7kepvl7zmrdvm3t@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b13fabbb-fe2e-b3a3-6e8e-c42b8bab063c@hisilicon.com>
Hi,
On 21/09/2017 at 14:45:17 +0800, YiPing Xu wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/9/20 17:16, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 20/09/2017 at 11:22:31 +0800, Xu Yiping wrote:
> > > From: Xu YiPing <xuyiping@hisilicon.com>
> > >
> > > After commit 2b2f5ff00f63 ("rtc: interface: ignore expired timers when
> > > enqueuing new timers"), the rtc_timer_enqueue will not reprogram the RTC
> > > when there is any non-expired timers in the timerqueue. If we set a
> > > RTC_TIMER between now and the next non-expired timers, it won't go into
> > > effect in time.
> > >
> > > So, besides ignoring the expired timers, we should take the next effect
> > > timer into account, and reprogram the RTC timer appropriately.
> > >
> >
> > Can you try this patch instead? I think it solves this issue:
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/792482/
>
> We've tested this patch, it works too.
>
> Will it be merged into the main tree?
>
Yes, I will send it as a fix for 4.14.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-21 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-20 3:22 Xu Yiping
2017-09-20 9:16 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-09-20 9:36 ` YiPing Xu
2017-09-21 6:45 ` YiPing Xu
2017-09-21 8:57 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170921085752.q7kepvl7zmrdvm3t@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy.chenjun@hisilicon.com \
--cc=wanghao24@huawei.com \
--cc=xuyiping@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®