From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752560AbdIVMrS (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:47:18 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001ae601.pphosted.com ([67.231.149.25]:54646 "EHLO mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752290AbdIVMrQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:47:16 -0400 Authentication-Results: ppops.net; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:47:04 +0100 From: Charles Keepax To: Florian Fainelli CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: Allow a device to indicate when to force a state Message-ID: <20170922124704.yfu46ak4rypai3vp@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170921010421.7467-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20170921010421.7467-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170921010421.7467-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1709220178 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 06:04:20PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > It may happen that a device needs to force applying a state, e.g: > because it only defines one state of pin states (default) but loses > power/register contents when entering low power modes. Add a > pinctrl_dev::flags bitmask to help describe future quirks and define > PINCTRL_FLG_FORCE_STATE as such a settable flag. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > --- > drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > drivers/pinctrl/core.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c > index 56fbe4c3e800..c450a97de88f 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c > @@ -1197,11 +1197,26 @@ int pinctrl_select_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_state *state) > { > struct pinctrl_setting *setting, *setting2; > struct pinctrl_state *old_state = p->state; > + bool force = false; > int ret; > > if (p->state == state) > return 0; I am guessing you probably intended to remove these two lines. > > + if (p->state) { > + list_for_each_entry(setting, &p->state->settings, node) { > + if (setting->pctldev->flags & PINCTRL_FLG_FORCE_STATE) > + force = true; > + } > + } > + > + /* Some controllers may want to force this operation when they define > + * only one set of functions and lose power state, e.g: pinctrl-single > + * with its pinctrl-single,low-power-state-loss property. > + */ > + if (p->state == state && !force) > + return 0; > + Thanks, Charles