mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ben Woodard <woodard@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Jim Foraker <foraker1@llnl.gov>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Travis Gummels <tgummels@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] exec: binfmt_misc: don't nullify Node->dentry in kill_node()
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:36:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170922143641.GA17210@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170922143619.GA17179@redhat.com>

kill_node() nullifies/checks Node->dentry to avoid double free. This
complicates the next changes and this is very confusing:

- we do not need to check dentry != NULL under entries_lock, kill_node()
  is always called under inode_lock(d_inode(root)) and we rely on this
  inode_lock() anyway, without this lock the MISC_FMT_OPEN_FILE cleanup
  could race with itself.

- if kill_inode() was already called and ->dentry == NULL we should not
  even try to close e->interp_file.

We can change bm_entry_write() to simply check !list_empty(list) before
kill_node. Again, we rely on inode_lock(), in particular it saves us from
the race with bm_status_write(), another caller of kill_node().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 fs/binfmt_misc.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
index f471809..f4de5ae 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -600,11 +600,7 @@ static void kill_node(Node *e)
 	struct dentry *dentry;
 
 	write_lock(&entries_lock);
-	dentry = e->dentry;
-	if (dentry) {
-		list_del_init(&e->list);
-		e->dentry = NULL;
-	}
+	list_del_init(&e->list);
 	write_unlock(&entries_lock);
 
 	if ((e->flags & MISC_FMT_OPEN_FILE) && e->interp_file) {
@@ -612,12 +608,11 @@ static void kill_node(Node *e)
 		e->interp_file = NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (dentry) {
-		drop_nlink(d_inode(dentry));
-		d_drop(dentry);
-		dput(dentry);
-		simple_release_fs(&bm_mnt, &entry_count);
-	}
+	dentry = e->dentry;
+	drop_nlink(d_inode(dentry));
+	d_drop(dentry);
+	dput(dentry);
+	simple_release_fs(&bm_mnt, &entry_count);
 }
 
 /* /<entry> */
@@ -662,7 +657,8 @@ static ssize_t bm_entry_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
 		root = file_inode(file)->i_sb->s_root;
 		inode_lock(d_inode(root));
 
-		kill_node(e);
+		if (!list_empty(&e->list))
+			kill_node(e);
 
 		inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
 		break;
@@ -791,7 +787,7 @@ static ssize_t bm_status_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
 		inode_lock(d_inode(root));
 
 		while (!list_empty(&entries))
-			kill_node(list_entry(entries.next, Node, list));
+			kill_node(list_first_entry(&entries, Node, list));
 
 		inode_unlock(d_inode(root));
 		break;
-- 
2.5.0

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-22 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-22 14:36 [PATCH 0/5] exec: binfmt_misc: fix use-after-free, kill iname[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE] Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-22 14:36 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2017-09-22 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] exec: binfmt_misc: shift filp_close(interp_file) from kill_node() to bm_evict_inode() Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-22 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] exec: binfmt_misc: remove the confusing e->interp_file != NULL checks Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-22 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] exec: binfmt_misc: fix race between load_misc_binary() and kill_node() Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-22 14:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] exec: binfmt_misc: kill the onstack iname[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE] array Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-22 15:24 ` [PATCH 0/5] exec: binfmt_misc: fix use-after-free, kill iname[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE] Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170922143641.GA17210@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=foraker1@llnl.gov \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgummels@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=woodard@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome