mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	davem@davemloft.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, bhe@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] kexec_file: factor out arch_kexec_kernel_*() from x86, powerpc
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:03:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170925080313.GA5970@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170922075807.GM17186@linaro.org>

HI AKASHI,
On 09/22/17 at 04:58pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
[snip]

> > >  /*
> > >   * Apply purgatory relocations.
> > >   *
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> > > index dd056fab9e35..4a2b24d94e04 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> > > @@ -134,6 +134,26 @@ struct kexec_file_ops {
> > >  #endif
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +int kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > +			     unsigned long buf_len);
> > > +void *kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image);
> > > +int kexec_kernel_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
> > > +int kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > +			    unsigned long buf_len);
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe
> > > +#define arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe kexec_kernel_image_probe
> > > +#endif
> > > +#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_load
> > > +#define arch_kexec_kernel_image_load kexec_kernel_image_load
> > > +#endif
> > > +#ifndef arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup
> > > +#define arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup kexec_kernel_post_load_cleanup
> > > +#endif
> > > +#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> > > +#define arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * struct kexec_buf - parameters for finding a place for a buffer in memory
> > >   * @image:	kexec image in which memory to search.
> > > @@ -276,12 +296,6 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size);
> > >  size_t crash_get_memory_size(void);
> > >  void crash_free_reserved_phys_range(unsigned long begin, unsigned long end);
> > >  
> > > -int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > -					 unsigned long buf_len);
> > > -void * __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image);
> > > -int __weak arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
> > > -int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > -					unsigned long buf_len);
> > 
> > I thought we can keep using the __weak function in common code and drop
> > the arch functions, no need the #ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe
> > and the function renaming stuff.  But I did not notice the powerpc
> > _probe function checks KEXEC_ON_CRASH, that should be checked earlier
> > and we can fail out early if not supported, but I have no idea
> > how to do it gracefully for now.
> > 
> > Also for x86 _load function it cleanups image->arch.elf_headers, it can
> > not be dropped simply.
> 
> Yeah, arm64 post_load_cleanup function also has some extra stuff.
> See my patch #7/8.

But the x86 cleanup was dropped silently, can you add it in x86
post_load_cleanup as well?

> 
> > Consider the above two issues, maybe you can keep the powerpc
> > version of _probe() and x86 version of _load(), and still copy the common code
> > to kexec_file.c weak functions.
> 
> It was exactly what I made before submitting v3, but I changed
> my mind a bit. My intension is to prevent the code being duplicated
> even though it has only a few lines of code.
> 
> I agree that '#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe' in kexec.h would be
> quite ugly, but similar usages can be spotted in the kernel source.
> 
> That said if you don't like it at all, I defer to you.

I understand your concern, maybe still use a weak function for 
arch_kexec_kernel_image_*, and they call the kexec_kernel_image_* in
kexec_file.c common code.

Like in general code:

int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
                                         unsigned long buf_len)
{
	return kexec_kernel_image_probe(image, buf, buf_len);
}

In architechture code it can add other code and call
kexec_kernel_image_*

It looks a bit better than the #ifdef way. 

[snip]

> 
> Thanks,
> -Takahiro AKASHI
> 

Thanks
Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-25  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-15 10:59 [PATCH v3 00/10] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] include: pe.h: remove message[] from mz header definition AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] resource: add walk_system_ram_res_rev() AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] kexec_file: factor out arch_kexec_kernel_*() from x86, powerpc AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-21  7:35   ` Dave Young
2017-09-22  7:58     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-25  8:03       ` Dave Young [this message]
2017-09-25  8:30         ` Dave Young
2017-09-25 18:15         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-25 15:36     ` David Howells
2017-09-25 18:18       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] kexec_file: factor out crashdump elf header function from x86 AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] asm-generic: add kexec_file_load system call to unistd.h AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: kexec_file: create purgatory AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] arm64: kexec_file: load initrd, device-tree and purgatory segments AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] arm64: kexec_file: set up for crash dump adding elf core header AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: enable KEXEC_FILE config AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] arm64: kexec_file: add Image format support AKASHI Takahiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170925080313.GA5970@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®