From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
davem@davemloft.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, bhe@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] kexec_file: factor out arch_kexec_kernel_*() from x86, powerpc
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:03:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170925080313.GA5970@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170922075807.GM17186@linaro.org>
HI AKASHI,
On 09/22/17 at 04:58pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
[snip]
> > > /*
> > > * Apply purgatory relocations.
> > > *
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> > > index dd056fab9e35..4a2b24d94e04 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> > > @@ -134,6 +134,26 @@ struct kexec_file_ops {
> > > #endif
> > > };
> > >
> > > +int kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > + unsigned long buf_len);
> > > +void *kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image);
> > > +int kexec_kernel_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
> > > +int kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > + unsigned long buf_len);
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe
> > > +#define arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe kexec_kernel_image_probe
> > > +#endif
> > > +#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_load
> > > +#define arch_kexec_kernel_image_load kexec_kernel_image_load
> > > +#endif
> > > +#ifndef arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup
> > > +#define arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup kexec_kernel_post_load_cleanup
> > > +#endif
> > > +#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> > > +#define arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * struct kexec_buf - parameters for finding a place for a buffer in memory
> > > * @image: kexec image in which memory to search.
> > > @@ -276,12 +296,6 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size);
> > > size_t crash_get_memory_size(void);
> > > void crash_free_reserved_phys_range(unsigned long begin, unsigned long end);
> > >
> > > -int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > - unsigned long buf_len);
> > > -void * __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image);
> > > -int __weak arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
> > > -int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> > > - unsigned long buf_len);
> >
> > I thought we can keep using the __weak function in common code and drop
> > the arch functions, no need the #ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe
> > and the function renaming stuff. But I did not notice the powerpc
> > _probe function checks KEXEC_ON_CRASH, that should be checked earlier
> > and we can fail out early if not supported, but I have no idea
> > how to do it gracefully for now.
> >
> > Also for x86 _load function it cleanups image->arch.elf_headers, it can
> > not be dropped simply.
>
> Yeah, arm64 post_load_cleanup function also has some extra stuff.
> See my patch #7/8.
But the x86 cleanup was dropped silently, can you add it in x86
post_load_cleanup as well?
>
> > Consider the above two issues, maybe you can keep the powerpc
> > version of _probe() and x86 version of _load(), and still copy the common code
> > to kexec_file.c weak functions.
>
> It was exactly what I made before submitting v3, but I changed
> my mind a bit. My intension is to prevent the code being duplicated
> even though it has only a few lines of code.
>
> I agree that '#ifndef arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe' in kexec.h would be
> quite ugly, but similar usages can be spotted in the kernel source.
>
> That said if you don't like it at all, I defer to you.
I understand your concern, maybe still use a weak function for
arch_kexec_kernel_image_*, and they call the kexec_kernel_image_* in
kexec_file.c common code.
Like in general code:
int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
unsigned long buf_len)
{
return kexec_kernel_image_probe(image, buf, buf_len);
}
In architechture code it can add other code and call
kexec_kernel_image_*
It looks a bit better than the #ifdef way.
[snip]
>
> Thanks,
> -Takahiro AKASHI
>
Thanks
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-25 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-15 10:59 [PATCH v3 00/10] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] include: pe.h: remove message[] from mz header definition AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] resource: add walk_system_ram_res_rev() AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] kexec_file: factor out arch_kexec_kernel_*() from x86, powerpc AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-21 7:35 ` Dave Young
2017-09-22 7:58 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-25 8:03 ` Dave Young [this message]
2017-09-25 8:30 ` Dave Young
2017-09-25 18:15 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-25 15:36 ` David Howells
2017-09-25 18:18 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] kexec_file: factor out crashdump elf header function from x86 AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] asm-generic: add kexec_file_load system call to unistd.h AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: kexec_file: create purgatory AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] arm64: kexec_file: load initrd, device-tree and purgatory segments AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] arm64: kexec_file: set up for crash dump adding elf core header AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: enable KEXEC_FILE config AKASHI Takahiro
2017-09-15 10:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] arm64: kexec_file: add Image format support AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170925080313.GA5970@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®