From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752247AbdI2P4w (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:56:52 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58162 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751836AbdI2P4v (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:56:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:56:39 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Brijesh Singh Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 02/17] x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Message-ID: <20170929155639.l2llk2h5kpthdwsb@pd.tnic> References: <20170927151329.70011-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20170927151329.70011-3-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20170928090242.ber7gynwaldinafa@pd.tnic> <20170928192347.gkpmpetmmp7523wu@pd.tnic> <0ed8db87-3f18-fd69-19e3-7f23a43bb8d2@amd.com> <20170929144146.ctidwarilxntpu3i@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:54:39AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > In production, you do not want to run encrypted guest on an unencrypted > hypervisor -- I was thinking about the debug environment. We can start > with mem_encrypt=sme and if we see the need for 'sev' arg then we can > extend it later. Yap, exactly. > I am working on the patch and will send for the review. thanks Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) --