From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752375AbdI3IDB (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:03:01 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60502 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751720AbdI3IC7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:02:59 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:02:42 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Brijesh Singh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v4 02/29] x86/CPU/AMD: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Message-ID: <20170930080242.ccmacvdeffnj72ne@pd.tnic> References: <20170919204627.3875-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20170919204627.3875-3-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20170929121900.3wc5axlkanfggpdr@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:44:24PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > Part1 is based on tip/master and Part2 is based on kvm/master. > > With the current division, we should be able to compile and run part1 > and part2 independently. This patch defines X86_FEATURE_SEV which is > currently been used by svm.c hence I kept the patch in Part2. > > If we move it in Part1 then Part2 build will fail -- I am okay with > including it as a pre-cursor to Part2 series. Is this something acceptable? No no, don't do anything. I was just wondering about the reason for the move. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) --