mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD, mm: Extend with mem_encrypt=sme option
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:16:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171001171617.uzwfzps7sxowfram@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f50eb4c-f2bb-f125-196f-c1456dd6c601@amd.com>

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:00:31PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> When SEV feature is disabled, KVM will not be able to launch any SEV
> guests.  When SEV support is available, KVM can enable it in a specific
> VM by setting SEV bit before executing the VMRUN instruction.

So I want to be able to disable SEV and the whole code that comes with
it in the *host*.

> Guest OS:
> --------
> Checks the MSR_AMD64_SEV to determine if SEV feature is enabled. Please
> note that the MSR is a read-only. IOW, MSR is not intercepted by the
> hypervisor.
> 
> Currently, mem_encrypt=xxx and CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT
> is don't care. We can not depend on the command line because when SEV is
> enabled in a VM then instruction fetch will be decrypted by the
> hardware. If we want then we can perform the comparison between the SEV
> state obtained through MSR with user supplied command line and trigger
> BUG() if they don't match.

And when we have supplied mem_encrypt=sme to the *host* cmdline, it
should be impossible to start SEV guests. IOW, that feature mask test
should not happen and I should do instead:

        } else if (!strncmp(buffer, cmd_sme, sizeof(buffer))) {
                sme_only = true;
		sev_enabled = false;
        }

Or, respectively, not set it here as it is false already but set it at
the end of the function like this:

        if (sme_only)
                return;

	sev_enabled = true;
}

Hmmm?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-01 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-27 15:13 [Part1 PATCH v5 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 01/17] Documentation/x86: Add AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) description Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 02/17] x86/mm: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-09-28  9:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-28 18:48     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-28 19:23       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 12:28         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 14:41           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 15:54             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29 15:56               ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 21:27     ` [Part1 PATCH v5.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30  8:49       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-29 23:06     ` [Part1 PATCH v5 18/18] x86/mm: add 'sme' argument in mem_encrypt= Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 11:56       ` [PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD, mm: Extend with mem_encrypt=sme option Borislav Petkov
2017-09-30 21:17         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-30 21:41           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-01 17:00             ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-01 17:16               ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-10-01 19:45                 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-01 22:02                   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-02 11:32                     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-02 12:41                       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-02 15:07                         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-10-03 10:50                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-03 11:20                             ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-02 13:44                 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-10-02 13:51                   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-10-02 16:35                     ` Tom Lendacky
2017-10-03 11:29                       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 03/17] x86/mm: Don't attempt to encrypt initrd under SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 04/17] x86/realmode: Don't decrypt trampoline area " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 05/17] x86/mm: Use encrypted access of boot related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-09-28 11:13   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-28 16:20   ` [Part1 PATCH v5.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 06/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:53   ` Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 17:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 19:17   ` [Part1 PATCH v5.1 " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 07/17] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 08/17] resource: Consolidate resource walking code Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 09/17] resource: Provide resource struct in resource walk callback Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 10/17] x86/mm, resource: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory pages Brijesh Singh
2017-09-28 16:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 11/17] x86/mm: Add DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 12/17] x86/boot: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-28 17:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 13/17] x86/io: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-28 17:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 14/17] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 15/17] percpu: Introduce DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED Brijesh Singh
2017-09-28 20:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 16/17] X86/KVM: Decrypt shared per-cpu variables when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29  5:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-27 15:13 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 17/17] X86/KVM: Clear encryption attribute " Brijesh Singh
2017-09-29  6:26 ` [Part1 PATCH v5 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171001171617.uzwfzps7sxowfram@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®