From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751478AbdJCJEX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 05:04:23 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:46832 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197AbdJCJEW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2017 05:04:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 11:04:06 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Thomas Gleixner , Nicolas Iooss Cc: X86 ML , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RAS/CEC: Use the right length for "cec_disable" Message-ID: <20171003090406.sagnvjoq5iearrrt@pd.tnic> References: <20171002092836.22971-1-bp@alien8.de> <20171002092836.22971-2-bp@alien8.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:42:56PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > From: Nicolas Iooss > > > > parse_cec_param() compares a string with "cec_disable" using only 7 > > characters of the 11-character-long string. Fix the length. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss > > Fixes: 011d82611172 ("RAS: Add a Corrected Errors Collector") > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170903075440.30250-1-nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > > --- > > drivers/ras/cec.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/ras/cec.c b/drivers/ras/cec.c > > index d0e5d6ee882c..586c296d1538 100644 > > --- a/drivers/ras/cec.c > > +++ b/drivers/ras/cec.c > > @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ int __init parse_cec_param(char *str) > > if (*str == '=') > > str++; > > > > - if (!strncmp(str, "cec_disable", 7)) > > + if (!strncmp(str, "cec_disable", 11)) > > This kind of issue happens over and over. So if you really want to use > strncmp() then this should be: > > #define CEC_DISABLE "cec_disable" > > if (!strncmp(str, CEC_DISABLE, strlen(CEC_DISABLE)) > > or we get a proper helper for that. Though in case of comparing some string > against a constant string strncmp() has no real advantage over strcmp() as > the comparison is guaranteed to be bound by the string constant. Right. Nicolas, wanna address that? Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.