From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752281AbdJDOWv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:22:51 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:58443 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751176AbdJDOWt (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:22:49 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 07:22:45 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Gary Hook <gary.hook@amd.com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v4.1 07/29] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted
 Virtualization (SEV) command support
Message-ID: <20171004142245.GA31796@infradead.org>
References: <20170919204627.3875-8-brijesh.singh@amd.co>
 <20171002204831.5947-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.1710041221390.19122@wniryva>
 <20171004092152.4lmjlsqrg25dgaxu@pd.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20171004092152.4lmjlsqrg25dgaxu@pd.tnic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 11:21:53AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:26:11PM +0530, P J P wrote:
> > Each return above needs to be on its own line.
> 
> ... because?

It's actually readable by humanѕ that way.