From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com, byungchul.park@lge.com, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@01.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [lockdep] b09be676e0 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000001f2
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:40:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004224008.3gbwuzn3zfwpidh3@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710040644.GJE89219.FOHMFSFOVtOQLJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 06:44:50AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:28:15AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > There are two bugs:
> > >
> > > 1) Somebody -- presumably lockdep -- is corrupting the stack. Need the
> > > lockdep people to look at that.
> > >
> > > 2) The 32-bit FP unwinder isn't handling the corrupt stack very well,
> > > It's blindly dereferencing untrusted data:
> > >
> > > /* Is the next frame pointer an encoded pointer to pt_regs? */
> > > regs = decode_frame_pointer(next_bp);
> > > if (regs) {
> > > frame = (unsigned long *)regs;
> > > len = regs_size(regs);
> > > state->got_irq = true;
> > >
> > > On 32-bit, regs_size() dereferences the regs pointer before we know it
> > > points to a valid stack. I'll fix that, along with the other unwinder
> > > improvements I discussed with Linus.
> >
> > Tetsuo and/or Fengguang,
> >
> > Would you mind testing with this patch? It should at least prevent the
> > unwinder panic and should hopefully print a useful unwinder dump
> > instead.
> >
> Here are two outputs.
Tetsuo, would you mind trying the following patch?
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index 8a13d468635a..50e0d2bc4528 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
/*
* This is a sneaky trick to help the unwinder find pt_regs on the stack. The
* frame pointer is replaced with an encoded pointer to pt_regs. The encoding
- * is just setting the LSB, which makes it an invalid stack address and is also
+ * is just clearing the MSB, which makes it an invalid stack address and is also
* a signal to the unwinder that it's a pt_regs pointer in disguise.
*
* NOTE: This macro must be used *after* SAVE_ALL because it corrupts the
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
.macro ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
mov %esp, %ebp
- orl $0x1, %ebp
+ andl $0x7fffffff, %ebp
#endif
.endm
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
index d145a0b1f529..acefab447f00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ static void unwind_dump(struct unwind_state *state)
state->stack_info.type, state->stack_info.next_sp,
state->stack_mask, state->graph_idx);
- for (sp = state->orig_sp; sp; sp = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
+ for (sp = PTR_ALIGN(state->orig_sp, sizeof(long)); sp;
+ sp = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
if (get_stack_info(sp, state->task, &stack_info, &visit_mask))
break;
@@ -77,6 +78,12 @@ static size_t regs_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
return sizeof(*regs);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+#define KERNEL_REGS_SIZE (sizeof(struct pt_regs) - 2*sizeof(long))
+#else
+#define KERNEL_REGS_SIZE (sizeof(struct pt_regs))
+#endif
+
static bool in_entry_code(unsigned long ip)
{
char *addr = (char *)ip;
@@ -174,6 +181,7 @@ static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
* This determines if the frame pointer actually contains an encoded pointer to
* pt_regs on the stack. See ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER.
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
{
unsigned long regs = (unsigned long)bp;
@@ -183,6 +191,17 @@ static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
return (struct pt_regs *)(regs & ~0x1);
}
+#else
+static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
+{
+ unsigned long regs = (unsigned long)bp;
+
+ if (regs & 0x80000000)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return (struct pt_regs *)(regs | 0x80000000);
+}
+#endif
static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
unsigned long *next_bp)
@@ -202,7 +221,7 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
regs = decode_frame_pointer(next_bp);
if (regs) {
frame = (unsigned long *)regs;
- len = regs_size(regs);
+ len = KERNEL_REGS_SIZE;
state->got_irq = true;
} else {
frame = next_bp;
@@ -226,6 +245,14 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
frame < prev_frame_end)
return false;
+ /*
+ * On 32-bit with user mode regs, make sure the last two regs are safe
+ * to access:
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) && regs && user_mode(regs) &&
+ !on_stack(info, frame, len + 2*sizeof(long)))
+ return false;
+
/* Move state to the next frame: */
if (regs) {
state->regs = regs;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 14:06 Fengguang Wu
2017-10-03 14:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 14:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 15:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 16:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 17:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 21:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-04 21:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-04 22:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 22:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-10-05 11:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-05 13:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 5:57 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-03 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-03 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 5:48 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-10 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-11 1:14 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11 2:36 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11 0:56 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11 1:02 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-12 1:15 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-03 17:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-04 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-04 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-04 14:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-10 5:30 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-05 13:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-05 14:54 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 12:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 12:59 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 13:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 12:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 13:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 15:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 15:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-10 5:08 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-12 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-12 9:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-12 9:28 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-12 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171004224008.3gbwuzn3zfwpidh3@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®