mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com, byungchul.park@lge.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@01.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [lockdep] b09be676e0 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000001f2
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:40:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004224008.3gbwuzn3zfwpidh3@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201710040644.GJE89219.FOHMFSFOVtOQLJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 06:44:50AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:28:15AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > There are two bugs:
> > > 
> > > 1) Somebody -- presumably lockdep -- is corrupting the stack.  Need the
> > >    lockdep people to look at that.
> > > 
> > > 2) The 32-bit FP unwinder isn't handling the corrupt stack very well,
> > >    It's blindly dereferencing untrusted data:
> > > 
> > > 	/* Is the next frame pointer an encoded pointer to pt_regs? */
> > > 	regs = decode_frame_pointer(next_bp);
> > > 	if (regs) {
> > > 		frame = (unsigned long *)regs;
> > > 		len = regs_size(regs);
> > > 		state->got_irq = true;
> > > 
> > >   On 32-bit, regs_size() dereferences the regs pointer before we know it
> > >   points to a valid stack.  I'll fix that, along with the other unwinder
> > >   improvements I discussed with Linus.
> > 
> > Tetsuo and/or Fengguang,
> > 
> > Would you mind testing with this patch?  It should at least prevent the
> > unwinder panic and should hopefully print a useful unwinder dump
> > instead.
> > 
> Here are two outputs.

Tetsuo, would you mind trying the following patch?


diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index 8a13d468635a..50e0d2bc4528 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
 /*
  * This is a sneaky trick to help the unwinder find pt_regs on the stack.  The
  * frame pointer is replaced with an encoded pointer to pt_regs.  The encoding
- * is just setting the LSB, which makes it an invalid stack address and is also
+ * is just clearing the MSB, which makes it an invalid stack address and is also
  * a signal to the unwinder that it's a pt_regs pointer in disguise.
  *
  * NOTE: This macro must be used *after* SAVE_ALL because it corrupts the
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
 .macro ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
 #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
 	mov %esp, %ebp
-	orl $0x1, %ebp
+	andl $0x7fffffff, %ebp
 #endif
 .endm
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
index d145a0b1f529..acefab447f00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ static void unwind_dump(struct unwind_state *state)
 			state->stack_info.type, state->stack_info.next_sp,
 			state->stack_mask, state->graph_idx);
 
-	for (sp = state->orig_sp; sp; sp = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
+	for (sp = PTR_ALIGN(state->orig_sp, sizeof(long)); sp;
+	     sp = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
 		if (get_stack_info(sp, state->task, &stack_info, &visit_mask))
 			break;
 
@@ -77,6 +78,12 @@ static size_t regs_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return sizeof(*regs);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+#define KERNEL_REGS_SIZE (sizeof(struct pt_regs) - 2*sizeof(long))
+#else
+#define KERNEL_REGS_SIZE (sizeof(struct pt_regs))
+#endif
+
 static bool in_entry_code(unsigned long ip)
 {
 	char *addr = (char *)ip;
@@ -174,6 +181,7 @@ static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
  * This determines if the frame pointer actually contains an encoded pointer to
  * pt_regs on the stack.  See ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER.
  */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
 {
 	unsigned long regs = (unsigned long)bp;
@@ -183,6 +191,17 @@ static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
 
 	return (struct pt_regs *)(regs & ~0x1);
 }
+#else
+static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
+{
+	unsigned long regs = (unsigned long)bp;
+
+	if (regs & 0x80000000)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return (struct pt_regs *)(regs | 0x80000000);
+}
+#endif
 
 static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
 			       unsigned long *next_bp)
@@ -202,7 +221,7 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
 	regs = decode_frame_pointer(next_bp);
 	if (regs) {
 		frame = (unsigned long *)regs;
-		len = regs_size(regs);
+		len = KERNEL_REGS_SIZE;
 		state->got_irq = true;
 	} else {
 		frame = next_bp;
@@ -226,6 +245,14 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
 	    frame < prev_frame_end)
 		return false;
 
+	/*
+	 * On 32-bit with user mode regs, make sure the last two regs are safe
+	 * to access:
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) && regs && user_mode(regs) &&
+	    !on_stack(info, frame, len + 2*sizeof(long)))
+		return false;
+
 	/* Move state to the next frame: */
 	if (regs) {
 		state->regs = regs;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-04 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 14:06 Fengguang Wu
2017-10-03 14:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 14:41   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 15:05     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 16:28       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 17:34         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 21:44           ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-04 21:06             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 21:30               ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-04 22:15                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 22:40             ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-10-05 11:02               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-05 13:57                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04  8:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10  5:57         ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-03 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-03 16:57   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10  5:48     ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-10 16:22       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 16:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 18:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 18:38             ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-11  1:14             ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11  2:36           ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11  0:56         ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11  1:02           ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-12  1:15           ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-03 17:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-04  9:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-04 10:31       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-04 14:15       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-10  5:30     ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-05 13:01   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-05 14:54     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 10:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 12:21         ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 12:54           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 12:59             ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 13:03             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 12:55           ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 13:26             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 14:17               ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 15:28                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 15:41                   ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 15:44                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 15:47                       ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-10  5:08   ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-12  8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-12  9:21   ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-12  9:28     ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-12 11:45       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171004224008.3gbwuzn3zfwpidh3@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®