From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751423AbdJEMja (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:39:30 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:45880 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751280AbdJEMj3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:39:29 -0400
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 14:39:06 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Fix alt_max_short macro to really be a
 max()
Message-ID: <20171005123906.n362s66dve3xplqm@pd.tnic>
References: <1507140492-7832-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com>
 <20171005073809.depam2y4vw2mb5ya@pd.tnic>
 <CA+rthh_EAOQ-VyoJ1zR=16n1_T0-wJPG7N1ESDBirzY7AbBXAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+rthh_o=oKyh_MiqX=B0VujBPOadaQjOYJexzWS6x6Wm=6B_Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+rthh_o=oKyh_MiqX=B0VujBPOadaQjOYJexzWS6x6Wm=6B_Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:35:33PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Note the "<"! ...comment is wrong, though the implementation works!

I know, I realized that when I looked at alternative-asm.h. Wanted to
double-check it with Micha first.

Testing your patch now...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.