From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com>
Cc: ccaulfie@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] fs/dlm: A possible sleep-in-atomic bug in dlm_master_lookup
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 03:26:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171007022611.GO21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58efdfb6-d18d-cb45-ecd4-4c9b680d7595@163.com>
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 09:59:41AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> According to fs/dlm/lock.c, the kernel may sleep under a spinlock,
> and the function call path is:
> dlm_master_lookup (acquire the spinlock)
> dlm_send_rcom_lookup_dump
> create_rcom
> dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer
> nodeid2con
> mutex_lock --> may sleep
>
> This bug is found by my static analysis tool and my code review.
Umm... dlm_master_lookup() locking is not nice, but to trigger that
you would need a combination of
* from_nodeid != our_nodeid (or we would've buggered off long before that point)
* dir_nodeid == our_nodeid
* failing dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].keep, name, len, &r)
(success would have the lock dropped)
* succeeding dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].toss, name, len, &r)
* from_master being true
* r->res_master_nodeid != from_nodeid and r->res_master_nodeid == our_nodeid
(the former is follows from the latter, actually)
The last one might or might not be impossible - I'm not familiar with dlm
guts, but it does have
log_error(ls, "from_master %d our_master", from_nodeid);
just before that call, so it's worth a further look.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-07 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-07 1:59 Jia-Ju Bai
2017-10-07 2:26 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-10-09 14:37 ` David Teigland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171007022611.GO21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=baijiaju1990@163.com \
--cc=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome