From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
dario.faggioli@citrix.com, bevan@bi-co.net, xen.list@daevel.fr,
joao.m.martins@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched/cputime: do not decrease steal time after live migration on xen
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:59:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010105925.mla7tpdh6stlxie3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507626848-24148-1-git-send-email-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
(Cc:-ed more gents involved in kernel/sched/cputime.c work. Full patch quoted
below.)
* Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> wrote:
> After guest live migration on xen, steal time in /proc/stat
> (cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL]) might decrease because steal returned by
> paravirt_steal_clock() might be less than this_rq()->prev_steal_time.
>
> For instance, steal time of each vcpu is 335 before live migration.
>
> cpu 198 0 368 200064 1962 0 0 1340 0 0
> cpu0 38 0 81 50063 492 0 0 335 0 0
> cpu1 65 0 97 49763 634 0 0 335 0 0
> cpu2 38 0 81 50098 462 0 0 335 0 0
> cpu3 56 0 107 50138 374 0 0 335 0 0
>
> After live migration, steal time is reduced to 312.
>
> cpu 200 0 370 200330 1971 0 0 1248 0 0
> cpu0 38 0 82 50123 500 0 0 312 0 0
> cpu1 65 0 97 49832 634 0 0 312 0 0
> cpu2 39 0 82 50167 462 0 0 312 0 0
> cpu3 56 0 107 50207 374 0 0 312 0 0
>
> The code in this patch is borrowed from do_stolen_accounting() which has
> already been removed from linux source code since commit ecb23dc6 ("xen:
> add steal_clock support on x86").
>
> Similar and more severe issue would impact prior linux 4.8-4.10 as
> discussed by Michael Las at
> https://0xstubs.org/debugging-a-flaky-cpu-steal-time-counter-on-a-paravirtualized-xen-guest.
> Unlike the issue discussed by Michael Las which would overflow steal time
> and lead to 100% st usage in top command for linux 4.8-4.10, the issue for
> linux 4.11+ would only decrease but not overflow steal time after live
> migration.
>
> References: https://0xstubs.org/debugging-a-flaky-cpu-steal-time-counter-on-a-paravirtualized-xen-guest
> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index 14d2dbf..57d09cab 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -238,10 +238,17 @@ static __always_inline u64 steal_account_process_time(u64 maxtime)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> if (static_key_false(¶virt_steal_enabled)) {
> - u64 steal;
> + u64 steal, steal_time;
> + s64 steal_delta;
> +
> + steal_time = paravirt_steal_clock(smp_processor_id());
> + steal = steal_delta = steal_time - this_rq()->prev_steal_time;
> +
> + if (unlikely(steal_delta < 0)) {
> + this_rq()->prev_steal_time = steal_time;
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> - steal = paravirt_steal_clock(smp_processor_id());
> - steal -= this_rq()->prev_steal_time;
> steal = min(steal, maxtime);
> account_steal_time(steal);
> this_rq()->prev_steal_time += steal;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-10 9:14 Dongli Zhang
2017-10-10 10:07 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2017-10-10 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-10-10 12:42 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2017-10-10 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 14:01 ` Rik van Riel
2017-10-11 7:47 ` Dongli Zhang
2017-10-11 7:29 ` Dongli Zhang
2017-10-10 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171010105925.mla7tpdh6stlxie3@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bevan@bi-co.net \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=xen.list@daevel.fr \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome