From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932282AbdJJPXF (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:23:05 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:53141 "EHLO mail-io0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755866AbdJJPXC (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:23:02 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDPXBUQH76bbftOZIREEzB1SOsjnCL/nb0CxtROMujbhKVZMOLzGVuEJZIjHKrQLhJSwlzoIA== Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:23:00 -0500 From: Dan Rue To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Tom Gall , LKML , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , linux- stable Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review Message-ID: <20171010152300.ko5hgwort2ciz4nk@xps> Mail-Followup-To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tom Gall , LKML , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , linux- stable References: <20171006083840.743659740@linuxfoundation.org> <86143165-0B1E-415D-B872-41B65EC0C7FA@linaro.org> <20171008072324.GC1428@kroah.com> <20171010071155.GD15404@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171010071155.GD15404@kroah.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170914 (1.9.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:11:55AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > >> kernel: 4.9.54-rc1 > > >> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > >> git branch: linux-4.9.y > > >> git commit: 1852eae92c460813692808234da35d142a405ab7 > > >> git describe: v4.9.53 > > >> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.53 > > > > >> > > >> No regressions (compared to build v4.9.52-65-gaceea42c68d9) > > > > > > How did your arm64 test build? There was a build regression in the -rc1 > > > release, are you sure you actually ran the correct image? > > > > So the header in that report was wrong. That's a c/n/p error on my > > part. I was in a rush to get you data before I was going to be gone > > for the day on Sat and wanting to get what we had into your hands > > before the Sunday deadline. > > > > The test results was for the RC as of commit > > 0e59436504287cddb9663857ae69c100b55f5e85 > > > > If you want to see the 'ugly' raw data it's all here : > > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.53-105-g0e5943650428/ > > I still don't understand. That _build_ should have failed, how did it > succeed enough to actually run the tests at all? It looks like the build failure shown at http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/stable-rc/v4.9.53-105-g0e59436/ requires CONFIG_KASAN to be set, which we do not set. All the other configs built, including ours, which can be seen at http://snapshots.linaro.org/openembedded/lkft/morty/hikey/rpb/linux-stable-rc-4.9/67/defconfig Dan