From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/5] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:10:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010181022.GB30738@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171009112424.30524-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:24:20PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> When hw queue is busy, we shouldn't take requests from
> scheduler queue any more, otherwise it is difficult to do
> IO merge.
>
> This patch fixes the awful IO performance on some
> SCSI devices(lpfc, qla2xxx, ...) when mq-deadline/kyber
> is used by not taking requests if hw queue is busy.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index 4ab69435708c..eca011fdfa0e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
> const bool has_sched_dispatch = e && e->type->ops.mq.dispatch_request;
> - bool did_work = false;
> + bool do_sched_dispatch = true;
> LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
>
> /* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
> @@ -125,18 +125,18 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> */
> if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
> blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
> - did_work = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
> + do_sched_dispatch = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
> } else if (!has_sched_dispatch) {
> blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
> blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
> }
>
> /*
> - * We want to dispatch from the scheduler if we had no work left
> - * on the dispatch list, OR if we did have work but weren't able
> - * to make progress.
> + * We want to dispatch from the scheduler if there was nothing
> + * on the dispatch list or we were able to dispatch from the
> + * dispatch list.
> */
> - if (!did_work && has_sched_dispatch) {
> + if (do_sched_dispatch && has_sched_dispatch) {
> do {
> struct request *rq;
>
> --
> 2.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 11:24 [PATCH V6 0/5] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance Ming Lei
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 1/5] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:10 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 2/5] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 3/5] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:15 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 4/5] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:23 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-10-12 10:01 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-12 14:52 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 15:22 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-12 15:24 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 15:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-12 15:37 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-12 15:49 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-09 11:24 ` [PATCH V6 5/5] blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are flushed Ming Lei
2017-10-10 18:26 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171010181022.GB30738@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®