From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752513AbdJKQyU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:54:20 -0400
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:51536 "EHLO
        merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751147AbdJKQyQ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:54:16 -0400
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:54:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>, dvyukov@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove
 smp_read_barrier_depends()
Message-ID: <20171011165405.xd4xfa2x3dcz4e57@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20171010155042.GD3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1507594969-8347-12-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20171010001951.GA6476@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <8079.1507628146@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <26455.1507724399@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <6309.1507735045@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
 <20171011155948.GE3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20171011161220.zqkdhynxerrcmvdd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20171011162412.o6lmjiag7spwabge@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20171011164748.GK3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171011164748.GK3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 09:47:48AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Interesting.  Do we currently have any dependencies headed by
> this_cpu_read()?

Nope, but almost, look for: cpufreq_update_util_data.