mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	y2038@lists.linaro.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: use __ktime_get_real_seconds instead of __current_kernel_time
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:40:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012154032.24a3007c479154d77c2767b4@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012140659.2749268-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:06:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> kdb is the only user of the __current_kernel_time() interface, which is
> not y2038 safe and should be removed at some point.
> 
> The kdb code also goes to great lengths to print the time in a
> human-readable format from 'struct timespec', again using a non-y2038-safe
> re-implementation of the generic time_to_tm() code.

Is it really necessary for the kdb `summary' command to print the
time/date?  Which puppies would die if we just removed it all?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12 14:06 Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-12 22:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-10-13  8:26   ` Daniel Thompson
2017-12-06 21:39     ` Jason Wessel
2017-12-06 21:50 ` Jason Wessel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171012154032.24a3007c479154d77c2767b4@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®