From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751937AbdJPI4j (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:56:39 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:49367 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751501AbdJPI4h (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:56:37 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB8sxqC/w2jblDB5qJPw0AJdx7oJz5ijKu6XGpidWxDXqLiCTY5kFJEuP0WXkZg4obZY8JLbg==
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:26:34 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
        sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 1/7] PM / Domains: Add support to select
 performance-state of domains
Message-ID: <20171016085634.GC21613@vireshk-i7>
References: <431a7a5803b4a552dfe2a71700e19b904c6d16dc.1507703370.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <990605fb7b17b75abe63c542a4be2e176152b9f6.1507800860.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <7hk1zvx36t.fsf@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7hk1zvx36t.fsf@baylibre.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 16-10-17, 03:59, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> I have some usecases in mind where the performance state might need to
> be selected based on OPP voltage, but that's now a change that can be
> added later when that feature is needed.

I will be more than happy to get that in.

> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

Thanks.

Do you think its a good time to get some bindings for this stuff now? The
bindings would be required for only users and not PM domains themselves for now.
Users are:

- OPP core: need per-OPP entry value for performance state.
- Devices: devices directly using the PM domain without OPP core (don't have
  DVFS). They can use the same property.

It might look similar to the properties I initially started with, I can just get
them refreshed.

-- 
viresh