From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
jeyu@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch: add atomic replace
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 06:05:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018110541.53mhxtskgbyhr3fl@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1710181034001.8638@san.suse.cz>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> 3. Drop immediate. It causes problems only and its advantages on x86_64
> are theoretical. You would still need to solve the interaction with atomic
> replace on other architecture with immediate preserved, but that may be
> easier. Or we can be aggressive and drop immediate completely. The force
> transition I proposed earlier could achieve the same.
I like this idea. When can we expect v3 of the force patches? :-)
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 3:41 [PATCH v3 0/2] livepatch: introduce " Jason Baron
2017-09-28 3:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] livepatch: Add dynamic klp_object and klp_func iterators Jason Baron
2017-10-06 21:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-10 15:15 ` Jason Baron
2017-10-11 2:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-16 14:47 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-09-28 3:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] livepatch: add atomic replace Jason Baron
2017-10-06 22:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-10 17:27 ` Jason Baron
2017-10-17 9:02 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-10-17 13:50 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-10-18 3:33 ` Jason Baron
2017-10-18 9:10 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-10-18 11:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-10-18 11:29 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-10-18 11:25 ` Petr Mladek
2017-10-19 21:44 ` Jason Baron
2017-10-20 7:44 ` Petr Mladek
2017-10-20 8:59 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-10-18 13:36 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-18 16:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-19 8:30 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-10-19 10:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-19 21:52 ` Jason Baron
2017-10-20 9:03 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-10-17 14:27 ` Petr Mladek
2017-10-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3.1 2/3] livepatch: shuffle core.c function order Jason Baron
2017-10-10 17:19 ` [PATCH v3.1 3/3] livepatch: add atomic replace Jason Baron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171018110541.53mhxtskgbyhr3fl@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®