From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753206AbdJSM4d (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:56:33 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60930 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbdJSM4c (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:56:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:55:52 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Abbott Liu Cc: aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, labbott@redhat.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, cdall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mawilcox@microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, thgarnie@google.com, keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, tixy@linaro.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@linaro.org, glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com, opendmb@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, jiazhenghua@huawei.com, dylix.dailei@huawei.com, zengweilin@huawei.com, heshaoliang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] Don't need to map the shadow of KASan's shadow memory Message-ID: <20171019125552.GB20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20171011082227.20546-1-liuwenliang@huawei.com> <20171011082227.20546-10-liuwenliang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171011082227.20546-10-liuwenliang@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 04:22:25PM +0800, Abbott Liu wrote: > Because the KASan's shadow memory don't need to track,so remove the > mapping code in kasan_init. Is there a reason why this isn't part of the earlier patch that introduced the code below? -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up