From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751154AbdJTGDw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:03:52 -0400
Received: from LGEAMRELO13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:43161 "EHLO
        lgeamrelo13.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750944AbdJTGDv (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:03:51 -0400
X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.126
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33
X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:03:47 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "kernel-team@lge.com" <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] lockdep: Remove BROKEN flag of
 LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
Message-ID: <20171020060347.GE3310@X58A-UD3R>
References: <1508392531-11284-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <1508392531-11284-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <1508425527.2429.11.camel@wdc.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710191718260.1971@nanos>
 <1508428021.2429.22.camel@wdc.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710192021480.2054@nanos>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710192107000.2054@nanos>
 <1508444515.2429.55.camel@wdc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1508444515.2429.55.camel@wdc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> * How much review has the Documentation/locking/crossrelease.txt received
>   before it went upstream? At least to me that document seems much harder
>   to read than other kernel documentation due to weird use of the English
>   grammar.

Sorry for the bad English. Please help it enhanced.

For others, Thomas and Matthew already did exactly what to say, well.