From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752323AbdJTHYW (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 03:24:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:52743 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752220AbdJTHYN (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 03:24:13 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+S7hDcV+JrlnnjLo1sRgZp6DJ8g4aGG/9NiHV/VkAUxJW8/+A/Fxxm/ZVV76xVb5fu/wgDxbw== Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:24:08 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kamalesh Babulal Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix memory leak in decode_instructions() Message-ID: <20171020072408.6kkfh442ilbun27s@gmail.com> References: <1507798934-18140-1-git-send-email-kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171012161016.z4ytxmm2rbfiewbl@treble> <20171019141208.atvlefiyopevma6c@treble> <20171019152106.2mncrl4e5g5lwcdk@gmail.com> <20171019153444.fm3hourp4burfaq7@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171019153444.fm3hourp4burfaq7@treble> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:21:06PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > > > I'm not sure if you saw the below ACK. In general, for objtool patches > > > which don't have you on CC, is it ok if I just add you to CC along with > > > the ACK? Or would you prefer I resend the patch to you with my SOB? > > > > Yeah, that would be nice - that way I get your SOB which is better. > > Sounds good. And for patches which you *are* on CC, do you have a > preference (ACK or resend with SOB)? In general resend with SOB would be more robust for me, but as the objtool/x86-debuginfo maintainer it's your call really, I can certainly do both. Thanks, Ingo