From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haver@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genwqe: Take R/W permissions into account when dealing with memory pages
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:51:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171021075146.GA21399@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171020192749.20194-1-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:27:49PM -0200, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently we assume userspace pages are always writable when doing
> memory pinning. This is not true, specially since userspace applications
> may allocate their memory the way they want, we have no control over it.
> If a read-only page is set for pinning, currently the driver fails due
> to get_user_pages_fast() refusing to map read-only pages as writable.
>
> This patch changes this behavior, by taking the permission flags of the
> pages into account in both pinning/unpinning process, as well as in the
> DMA data copy-back to userpace (which we shouldn't try to do blindly,
> since it will fail in case of read-only-pages).
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Haverkamp <haver@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Arnd/Greg, we found this bug recently, although not critical,
> it's really a boring issue affecting driver functionality.
> If it's possible to take this patch still on v4.14, we'd be
> really thankful!
> But we know it's late, so if not possible, v4.15 is cool.
Is this a regression? It seems like it's just a "fix something that has
always been broken but no one has noticed yet" type of thing, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-21 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-20 19:27 Guilherme G. Piccoli
2017-10-21 7:51 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-10-22 13:25 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171021075146.GA21399@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=haver@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome