From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
chris.zhong@rock-chips.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix zImage file size not aligned with CONFIG_EFI_STUB enabled
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171023085006.GM20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59ED6179.5020301@rock-chips.com>
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:26:49AM +0800, jeffy wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> On 10/22/2017 09:01 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >On 22 October 2017 at 13:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
> ><linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:01:13PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>>On 18 October 2017 at 06:01, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> >>>>The zImage file size should be aligned.
> >>>>
> >>>>Fixes: e4bae4d0b5f3 ("arm/efi: Split zImage code and data into separate PE/COFF sections")
> >>>>Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
> >>>>---
> >>>>
> >>>> arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S | 8 ++++----
> >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>>diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> >>>>index b38dcef90756..1636fa259577 100644
> >>>>--- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> >>>>+++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
> >>>>@@ -70,10 +70,6 @@ SECTIONS
> >>>> .got : { *(.got) }
> >>>> _got_end = .;
> >>>>
> >>>>- /* ensure the zImage file size is always a multiple of 64 bits */
> >>>>- /* (without a dummy byte, ld just ignores the empty section) */
> >>>>- .pad : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
> >>>>-
> >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
> >>>> .data : ALIGN(4096) {
> >>>> __pecoff_data_start = .;
> >>>>@@ -93,6 +89,10 @@ SECTIONS
> >>>> __pecoff_data_rawsize = . - ADDR(.data);
> >>>> #endif
> >>>>
> >>>>+ /* ensure the zImage file size is always a multiple of 64 bits */
> >>>>+ /* (without a dummy byte, ld just ignores the empty section) */
> >>>>+ .pad : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
> >>>>+
> >>>> _edata = .;
> >>>>
> >>>> _magic_sig = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(0x016f2818);
> >>>>--
> >>>>2.11.0
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>This is not the right fix. If CONFIG_EFI_STUB is enabled, the zImage
> >>>filesize should be rounded up to 512 bytes not 8 bytes. The '. =
> >>>ALIGN(512);' in the .data section appears to ensure that, but for some
> >>>reason, that appears not to be working.
> >>
> >>Actually, the existing .pad section is totally and utterly bogus when
> >>EFI is enabled:
> >>
> >> . = ALIGN(4);
> >> _etext = .;
> >>
> >> .got.plt : { *(.got.plt) }
> >> _got_start = .;
> >> .got : { *(.got) }
> >> _got_end = .;
> >>
> >>The .got.plt and .got are always word-based. This is then followed by
> >>.pad, which does nothing but pad out to a multiple of 64 bit:
> >>
> >> /* ensure the zImage file size is always a multiple of 64 bits */
> >> /* (without a dummy byte, ld just ignores the empty section) */
> >> .pad : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
> >>
> >>So this may add zero or 4 bytes of padding.
> >>
> >>This is then followed by the EFI data:
> >>
> >> .data : ALIGN(4096) {
> >> ...
> >> . = ALIGN(512);
> >> }
> >>
> >>which is aligned to 4K but aligns the end of itself to 512.
> >>
> >>So, we have the end of .got aligned to 4, followed by .pad that tries to
> >>align to 8, followed by an optional .data section. This is pointless.
> >>
> >>A sane patch would be to choose between the EFI .data section and the
> >>.pad section. So, it should be:
> >>
> >>#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
> >> .data : ALIGN(4096) {
> >> ...
> >> . = ALIGN(512);
> >> }
> >>#else
> >> .pad : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
> >>#endif
> >>
> >
> >Agreed, the .pad section has no point for EFI_STUB=y. However, it
> >seems this symptom is caused by the same issues I am trying to address
> >here
> >
> >https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=150488477807353
> >
> >which is that we have __ksymtab_xxx sections that we should discard,
> >because the linker will otherwise emit them /after/ .data or .pad.
> >This is caused by the use of lib/sort.c in the EFI stub, which
> >contains an EXPORT_SYMBOL().
>
> hmm, right, didn't notice the data is already aligned...
> so it's indeed caused by the ksym:
>
> [ 9] .data PROGBITS 006ce000 6d6000 000200 00 WA 0
> 0 4096
> [10] ___ksymtab+sort PROGBITS 006ce200 6d6200 000008 00 WA 0
> 0 4
> [11] .bss NOBITS 006ce208 6d6208 00001c 00 WA 0
> 0 4
It's earlier - look for __ksymtab_strings.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-23 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 5:01 Jeffy Chen
2017-10-18 6:19 ` Chris Zhong
2017-10-22 11:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-22 12:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-22 13:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-23 3:26 ` jeffy
2017-10-23 8:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-10-23 10:24 ` jeffy
2017-10-23 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-23 11:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 8:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 9:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-24 10:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-10-24 9:16 ` jeffy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171023085006.GM20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=chris.zhong@rock-chips.com \
--cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®