mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] f2fs: give up CP_TRIMMED_FLAG if it drops discards
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:46:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024124643.GA82092@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20280b72-f2c1-7a43-ebd4-9c5fbac725a9@huawei.com>

On 10/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> On 2017/10/4 9:08, Chao Yu wrote:
> > From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> > 
> > In ->umount, once we drop remained discard entries, we should not
> > set CP_TRIMMED_FLAG with another checkpoint.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - rebase on last codes of Jaegeuk's dev-test branch.
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  2 +-
> >  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  fs/f2fs/super.c   |  5 +++--
> >  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index f274805e231d..c85f49c41003 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -2565,7 +2565,7 @@ void init_discard_policy(struct discard_policy *dpolicy, int discard_type,
> >  						unsigned int granularity);
> >  void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t old, block_t new);
> >  void stop_discard_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > -void f2fs_wait_discard_bios(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > +bool f2fs_wait_discard_bios(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >  void clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc);
> >  void release_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >  int npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool for_ra);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 4a108321233d..bfbcff8339c5 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1196,12 +1196,13 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  	return issued;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void __drop_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > +static bool __drop_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  {
> >  	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> >  	struct list_head *pend_list;
> >  	struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp;
> >  	int i;
> > +	bool dropped = false;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> >  	for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > @@ -1209,9 +1210,12 @@ static void __drop_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  		list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tmp, pend_list, list) {
> >  			f2fs_bug_on(sbi, dc->state != D_PREP);
> >  			__remove_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
> > +			dropped = true;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  	mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> > +
> > +	return dropped;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void __wait_one_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > @@ -1306,15 +1310,18 @@ void stop_discard_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* This comes from f2fs_put_super */
> > -void f2fs_wait_discard_bios(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > +bool f2fs_wait_discard_bios(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  {
> >  	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> >  	struct discard_policy dpolicy;
> > +	bool dropped;
> >  
> >  	init_discard_policy(&dpolicy, DPOLICY_UMOUNT, dcc->discard_granularity);
> >  	__issue_discard_cmd(sbi, &dpolicy);
> > -	__drop_discard_cmd(sbi);
> > +	dropped = __drop_discard_cmd(sbi);
> >  	__wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, &dpolicy);
> > +
> > +	return dropped;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int issue_discard_thread(void *data)
> > @@ -1659,7 +1666,7 @@ void init_discard_policy(struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
> >  		dpolicy->max_interval = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME;
> >  		dpolicy->max_requests = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST;
> >  		dpolicy->io_aware_gran = MAX_PLIST_NUM;
> > -		dpolicy->io_aware = false;
> > +		dpolicy->io_aware = true;
> 
> I notice this change should not belong to this patch, could you please help to
> move this into "f2fs: split discard policy" in your branch?

Yup, done. Could you check it in dev-test?

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >  	} else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) {
> >  		dpolicy->max_requests = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST;
> >  		dpolicy->io_aware_gran = MAX_PLIST_NUM;
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index a13269d1a1f0..1d68c18a487b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -807,6 +807,7 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> >  {
> >  	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(sb);
> >  	int i;
> > +	bool dropped;
> >  
> >  	f2fs_quota_off_umount(sb);
> >  
> > @@ -827,9 +828,9 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* be sure to wait for any on-going discard commands */
> > -	f2fs_wait_discard_bios(sbi, true);
> > +	dropped = f2fs_wait_discard_bios(sbi);
> >  
> > -	if (f2fs_discard_en(sbi) && !sbi->discard_blks) {
> > +	if (f2fs_discard_en(sbi) && !sbi->discard_blks && !dropped) {
> >  		struct cp_control cpc = {
> >  			.reason = CP_UMOUNT | CP_TRIMMED,
> >  		};
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-24 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-04  1:08 [PATCH v2 1/6] f2fs: support issuing/waiting discard in range Chao Yu
2017-10-04  1:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] f2fs: wrap discard policy Chao Yu
2017-10-04  1:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] f2fs: split " Chao Yu
2017-10-04  1:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] f2fs: reduce cmd_lock coverage in __issue_discard_cmd Chao Yu
2017-10-04  1:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] f2fs: trace f2fs_remove_discard Chao Yu
2017-10-04  1:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] f2fs: give up CP_TRIMMED_FLAG if it drops discards Chao Yu
2017-10-24  8:24   ` Chao Yu
2017-10-24 12:46     ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-10-24 14:05       ` Chao Yu
2017-10-25  5:45         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-10-25  5:53           ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171024124643.GA82092@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®