From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752031AbdJYOvm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:51:42 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:38050 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751951AbdJYOvk (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:51:40 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:46:26 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/27] x86: assembly, make some functions local
Message-ID: <20171025144625.5f5me7mpuv4uo7nt@salmiak>
References: <20171002091246.28432-1-jslaby@suse.cz>
 <20171002091246.28432-19-jslaby@suse.cz>
 <CAKv+Gu9C88ToAx+8KcGacUECo7ExnTTBmibEjpB2WkfFvjoZvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5a3785ea-d2d8-dd51-4b02-12f4ca5507d7@suse.cz>
 <CAKv+Gu-7q_Pr5SoUY_kUstaVusUxvXt9e8xeChQySGZ6h+jdAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9dfcee94-2058-8986-526c-f7ef9ebada66@suse.cz>
 <20171006132121.GC14023@leverpostej>
 <a506fc39-80d3-56da-a87f-b5e4bef8bad5@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a506fc39-80d3-56da-a87f-b5e4bef8bad5@suse.cz>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:21:48PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/06/2017, 03:21 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > If the aim of this series is to introduce something that architectures
> > use consistently, then can we please actually poke other architectures
> > about it? e.g. send this to linux-arch, with a cover letter explaining
> > the idea and asking maintainers to take a look.
> 
> Sure, with v5, I will.

Thanks; that's much appreciated, and I look forward to it!

Mark.