From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932290AbdJYP26 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:28:58 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:51488 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932270AbdJYP2z (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:28:55 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QulAy3L/xYK3qasVAKbeDtERGSBG+VfTB3JfXBwqeDcYgpnGypqSojmjLdJyWFjmzCpDN1yw==
From: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
        Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re [PATCH v2] lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:28:41 +0200
Message-Id: <20171025152841.6746-1-courbet@google.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.0.rc2.357.g7e34df9404-goog
In-Reply-To: <20171025145938.wpr7spsujounqudk@yury-thinkpad>
References: <20171025145938.wpr7spsujounqudk@yury-thinkpad>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Thanks for the comments Yury.

> But I'd like also to keep _find_next_bit() consistent with
> _find_next_bit_le()

Not sure I understand what you're suggesting here: Do you want a
find_next_and_bit_le() or do you want to make _find_next_bit_le() more
like _find_next_bit() ? In the latter case we might just want to merge
it with _find_next_bit() and end up with an extra is_le parameter :)