From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932255AbdJZHJJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:09:09 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33462 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751228AbdJZHJE (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:09:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:09:13 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "# 3.4.x" , Brian Foster , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 85/85] xfs: move two more RT specific functions into CONFIG_XFS_RT Message-ID: <20171026070913.GB27323@kroah.com> References: <20171024125654.028122623@linuxfoundation.org> <20171024125657.579472977@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:09:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > 4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > commit 785545c8982604fe3ba79d16409e83993be77d5e upstream. > > > > The last cleanup introduced two harmless warnings: > > > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:480:1: warning: '__xfs_getfsmap_rtdev' defined but not used > > fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:372:1: warning: 'xfs_getfsmap_rtdev_rtbitmap_helper' defined but not used > > > > This moves those two functions as well. > > > > Fixes: bb9c2e543325 ("xfs: move more RT specific code under CONFIG_XFS_RT") > > I haven't checked what kernel contains bb9c2e543325, but if I remember correctly > the warning only showed up during the 4.14-rc cycle, so unless you backported > bb9c2e543325 or I misremembered it, backporting my fix would be wrong. > > I lost remote access to my build box, so I can't verify at the moment. > Can you double-check that we want this backport? Yes, that patch is part of the xfs patch series that is in this -rc release before your fixup patch here. So all should be good, thanks for checking. greg k-h